Abstract
Background: Research suggests that lowering maternal morbidities associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can be achieved with earlier risk group identification.
Aims: Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine potential markers for identifying first-trimester pregnant women who are at high risk for developing GDM.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. The pertinent maternal clinical data were retrieved prior to 13+6 weeks of gestation, and a binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential GDM predictors. The predictive accuracy was evaluated using the area below the receiver operating characteristics curves.
Results: In comparison to the control group, the GDM group had significantly higher mean values for age, body mass index (BMI), mean fasting blood glucose (FBG), and hemoglobin (p < 0.05). The Pearson’s correlation coefficients indicated that the first-trimester FBG was significantly positively correlated with the second-trimester FBG. Higher FBG and BMI values were associated with an increased risk of developing GDM (odds ratio (OR) = 3.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.03-4.55 and OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.12–1.25). In terms of predicting GDM, the FBG parameter demonstrated the greatest area under the curve values (0.66), followed by the BMI parameter (0.69). For GDM prediction, the cut-off value for FBG was 4.32 mM, whereas that for BMI was 23.7 kg/m2.
Conclusion: The first-trimester FBG and BMI could be utilized to predict gestational diabetes.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0607-5] [PMID: 28283913]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067946] [PMID: 35613728]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnac003] [PMID: 35041752]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3302] [PMID: 32068345]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/epi-2021-0096] [PMID: 34337972]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.285] [PMID: 34505412]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0387]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2478250] [PMID: 36440470]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.190797] [PMID: 32989023]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S002] [PMID: 33298413]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000899] [PMID: 34192341]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612827666210125155428] [PMID: 33550962]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S014] [PMID: 33298425]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1216] [PMID: 33184151]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2087298] [PMID: 35867537]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_852_18] [PMID: 34782531]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.035] [PMID: 34968458]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/5584_2020_552] [PMID: 32548833]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0511] [PMID: 26223239]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2021.10.007 ] [PMID: 34468745]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab655 ] [PMID: 34468745]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04874-x] [PMID: 35787265]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pm.2021.110954] [PMID: 35069068]