Abstract
Background: Osteosarcoma (OS) is a common primary malignant bone tumor that mainly occurs in children and adolescents. The use of IL-8 inhibitor compounds has been reported in patents, which can be used to treat and/or prevent osteosarcoma, but the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma remains to be investigated. At present, osteoblasts and osteoclasts play an important role in the occurrence and development of OS. However, the relationship between osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the specific participation mechanism and inflammatory response of OS patients has not been further studied.
Methods: The transcriptome, clinical data, and other data related to OS were downloaded from the GEO database to analyze them with 200 known inflammatory response genes. We set the screening conditions as p < 0.05 and | log2FC| > 0.50, screened the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to OS, tested the correlation coefficient between the OS INF gene and clinical risk, and analyzed the survival prognosis. We further enriched and analyzed the DEGs and inflammatory response genes of OS with GO/KEGG to explore the potential biological function and signal pathway mechanism of OS inflammatory response genes. Moreover, the virtual screening of drug sensitivity of OS based on the FDA drug library was also carried out to explore potential therapeutic drugs targeted to regulate OS osteogenesis and osteoclast inflammation, and finally, the molecular dynamics simulation verification of OS core protein and potential drugs was carried out to explore the binding stability and mechanism between potential drugs and core protein.
Results: Through differential analysis of GSE39058, GSE36001, GSE87624, and three other data sets closely related to OS osteoblasts and osteoclasts, we found that there was one upregulated gene (CADM1) and one down-regulated gene (PHF15) related to OS. In addition, GSEA enrichment analysis of the DEGs of OS showed that it was mainly involved in the progress of OS through biological functions, such as oxidative photosynthesis, acute junction, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. The enrichment analysis of OS DEGs revealed that they mainly affect the occurrence and progress of OS by participating in the regulation of the actin skeleton, PI3K Akt signal pathway, complement and coagulation cascade. According to the expression of CSF3R in OS patients, a risk coefficient model and a diagnostic model were established. It was found that the more significant the difference in the CSF3R gene in OS patients, the greater the risk coefficient of disease (p < 0.05). The AUC under the curve of the CSF3R gene was greater than 0.65, which had a good diagnostic significance for OS. The above results showed that the prognosis risk gene CSF3R related to OS inflammation was closely related to the survival status of OS patients. Finally, through the virtual screening of the ZINC drug library and molecular dynamics simulation, it was found that the docking model formed by the core protein CSF3R and the compounds, Leucovorin and Methotrexate, were the most stable, which revealed that the compounds Leucovorin and Methotrexate might play a role in the treatment of OS by combining with the inflammatory response related factor CSF3R of OS.
Conclusion: CSF3R participates in the occurrence and development of OS bone destruction by regulating the inflammatory response of osteoblasts and osteoclasts and can affect the survival prognosis of OS patients.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442] [PMID: 29313949]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2020.12.024] [PMID: 33359211]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-019-02683-w] [PMID: 31741049]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061182] [PMID: 33809018]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-015-1918-y] [PMID: 25935149]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04046-0] [PMID: 11229684]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2309499019838293] [PMID: 30909848]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3240-6] [PMID: 25986475]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0078] [PMID: 28263668]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI3523] [PMID: 9916131]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2012.07.003] [PMID: 22846337]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25744] [PMID: 21472721]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gm406] [PMID: 23339462]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0576] [PMID: 29066513]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i35.7938] [PMID: 27672289]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0209] [PMID: 25568067]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18813] [PMID: 29228633]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-018-0880-6] [PMID: 30153855]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202896] [PMID: 30153287]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14229] [PMID: 31705593]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.983606] [PMID: 36105405]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13578-021-00600-w] [PMID: 34022967]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.606765] [PMID: 33585227]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-02146-8] [PMID: 34706747]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32207] [PMID: 30761524]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hepr.13479] [PMID: 31894653]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-019-03699-7] [PMID: 31041512]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2020.1864096] [PMID: 33371790]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.192781] [PMID: 27779157]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.11-6-694] [PMID: 16794248]