Abstract
Background: Sufentanil, an opioid analgesic, is used as an induction agent for general anesthesia during surgery. Sufentanil is more active than other anesthetics and has a narrow therapeutic range. Therefore, a precise dosage regimen is necessary when administering sufentanil.
Objective: This study aimed to develop a bioanalytical method for the determination of sufentanil within the sensitive concentration range more than that in a previous study utilizing protein precipitation (PP) and determine the plasma concentration of sufentanil.
Methods: A method for quantitating sufentanil was developed using ultra–high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS) and detection by electrospray ionization (ESI). The internal standard was sufentanil-d5. Chromatographic separation was performed using an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm) from Waters (Milford, MA, USA). Protein precipitation (PP) was used for sample preparation, and gradient elution was conducted using a mobile phase consisting of 1 mL of 2M ammonium acetate in 99% formic acid in 1 L of water or in 1 L of acetonitrile. The total run time for the analysis was 5 min, and the flow rate was 0.4 mL/min.
Results: Standard curves were linear over ranges of 0.025–30 ng/mL for sufentanil with a correlation coefficient (r2) greater than 0.9998. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.025 ng/mL. The intra– and inter–day accuracies were 97.66%–108.8% and 101.25%–103.17%, respectively, and the precision did not exceed 15% for sufentanil.
Conclusion: This study developed a validated, simple, sensitive, and convenient UPLC–MS/MS method for quantifying sufentanil in human plasma. This method was applied to determine sufentanil concentration in the plasma of patients undergoing surgery. The bioanalytical method using PP showed a sufficiently sensitive concentration range. This method could be applied to various pharmacokinetic studies of sufentanil.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199102000-00012] [PMID: 1671323]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2016.1134487] [PMID: 26799508]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00003088-198308050-00004] [PMID: 6226471]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198836030-00003] [PMID: 2903821]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaa123] [PMID: 32901795]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000515787] [PMID: 34077940]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(03)00110-9] [PMID: 12763543]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2012.03.050] [PMID: 22522038]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmc.4290] [PMID: 29768657]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.10.006] [PMID: 25464106]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60048-1] [PMID: 23554712]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100455-5.00012-6]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/15734110113099990003]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00914-5] [PMID: 12554139]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2019.104696] [PMID: 31669393]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1570-0232(01)00569-4] [PMID: 11996488]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.606] [PMID: 11870891]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2007.06.003] [PMID: 17628384]