Abstract
Background: In cancer, Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are powerful oncoproteins that can lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis when mutated or overexpressed, making them crucial targets for cancer treatment. In endothelial cells, one of them is vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), a tyrosine kinase receptor that is produced and is the most essential regulator of angiogenic factors involved in tumor angiogenesis. So, a series of new N-(4-(4-amino-6,7-dimethoxyquinazolin-2-yloxy)phenyl)-N-phenyl cyclopropane-1,1- dicarboxamide derivatives as VEGFR-2 inhibitors have been designed and synthesized.
Methods: The designed derivatives were synthesized and evaluated using H-NMR, C13-NMR, and Mass spectroscopy. The cytotoxicity was done with HT-29 and COLO-205 cell lines. The potent compound was further studied for Vegfr- 2 kinase inhibition assay. Furthermore, the highest activity compound was tested for cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. The molecular docking investigation was also done with the help of the Glide-7.6 program interfaced with Maestro- 11.3 of Schrodinger 2017. The molecular dynamics simulation was performed on the Desmond module of Schrodinger.
Results: Compound SQ2 was observed to have promising cytotoxic activity (IC50 = 3.38 and 10.55 μM) in comparison to the reference drug Cabozantinib (IC50 = 9.10 and 10.66 μM) against HT-29 and COLO-205, respectively. The synthesized compound SQ2 showed VEGFR-2 kinase inhibition activity (IC50 = 0.014 μM) compared to the reference drug, Cabozantinib (IC50 = 0.0045 μM). Moreover, compound SQ2 strongly induced apoptosis by arresting the cell cycle in the G1 and G2/M phases. The docking study was performed to understand the binding pattern of the new compounds to the VEGFR-2 active site. Docking results attributed the potent VEGFR-2 inhibitory effect of the new compounds as they bound to the key amino acids in the active site, Asp1044, and Glu883, as well as their hydrophobic interaction with the receptor's hydrophobic pocket. The advanced computational study was also done with the help of molecular dynamics simulation.
Conclusion: The findings show that the developed derivatives SQ2 and SQ4 are equally powerful as cabozantinib at cellular and enzymatic levels. The apoptosis and cell cycle results show that the proposed compounds are potent. This research has provided us with identical or more potent VEGFR-2 inhibitors supported by the results of docking studies, molecular dynamics simulation, cytotoxic actions, in vitro VEGFR-2 inhibition, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111607] [PMID: 31446247]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.04.001] [PMID: 28411406]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70211-5] [PMID: 22658655]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2017.11.010] [PMID: 29146452]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104090] [PMID: 32683176]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.12.016] [PMID: 26717201]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.10.095] [PMID: 19896842]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm0195-27] [PMID: 7584949]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/carcin/21.3.505] [PMID: 10688871]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.09.014] [PMID: 20943391]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-1011] [PMID: 23548264]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2016.03.061] [PMID: 27068889]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.105.084145] [PMID: 16002463]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd773] [PMID: 12120282]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2011.11.013] [PMID: 22208996]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0264] [PMID: 21926191]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.05.012] [PMID: 24970311]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603176] [PMID: 16773076]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.10.040] [PMID: 19854051]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.04.009] [PMID: 18434145]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.12019] [PMID: 23216836]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.11.023] [PMID: 24368209]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bfopcu.2013.08.003]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.03.002]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm2013453] [PMID: 22229669]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.10.058] [PMID: 24269511]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1358/dot.2010.46.9.1516989] [PMID: 20967300]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ml500066m] [PMID: 24944742]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2004.09.044] [PMID: 15922853]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104510] [PMID: 33279248]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.102997] [PMID: 31136902]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.04.010] [PMID: 31026719]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116384]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.131984]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4889] [PMID: 19808973]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2014.09.037] [PMID: 25438768]