Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2405-5204
ISSN (Online): 2405-5212

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Influence of Gas Medium State Parameters on the Pressure Port Design of Gas Wave Ejector

Author(s): Yiming Zhao, Dongxu Cai and Dapeng Hu*

Volume 16, Issue 1, 2023

Published on: 04 April, 2023

Page: [56 - 68] Pages: 13

DOI: 10.2174/2405520416666230307115232

Price: $65

conference banner
Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore and emphasize the influence mechanism and law of gas parameters on pressure port design.

Methods: CFD commercial software FLUENT was used for numerical simulation in this study, and a three-dimensional numerical model was employed to improve the accuracy of calculation. The GWE experimental platform was also built to verify the theoretical and numerical analysis results.

Results: When the expansion ratio α is raised from 1.35 to 2.0, the average shock velocity vs can increase by about 4.9%, and when raising the compression ratio from 1.05 to 1.2, the change of vs is only 1.4% relatively. Raising the expansion ratio value from 1.35 to 2.0, the optimal offset of the high- and medium-pressure ports only changes by 5.3%, and the decrease of the ejection rate caused by the deviation of the aforementioned offset is only about 4.3%,which proves that the equipment has strong ability to resist fluctuations of working conditions.

Conclusion: Moving velocity of the shock wave varies with temperature, working pressure ratio and adiabatic index of the gas. The increase of high- and low-pressure inlet gas temperatures will cause an increment of vs and as, and the influence of high-pressure inlet gas temperature Tht on vs is greater. There are optimal high- and medium-pressure port offsets under different pressure ratios as the experimental results have shown. When the pressure ratio remains constant, the change in pressure value does not have a significant impact on the optimal port design and equipment performance.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Wu GS, Zhong DT, Liu SQ, Yan JJ, Liu JP. Experimental investigation of efficient injector of low pressure natural gas. J Eng Therm 2009; 30(6): 974-6.
[2]
Tashtoush BM, Al-Nimr MA, Khasawneh MA. A comprehensive review of ejector design, performance, and applica-tions. Appl Energy 2019; 240: 138-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.185]
[3]
Liu S, Wang X, Fan L, Han Q, Ye L. A new technique of supercharging by ejectors and compressors in the Jingbian Gas Field, Ordos Basin. Nat Gas Ind 2013; 33: 96-9.
[4]
Hu D, Zhao Y, Wu T, Yu Y, Wang J. The experimental research and mechanism analysis on the influence of wave rotor rotational speed on the wave system and flow losses of gas wave ejector. Chem Eng Process 2019; 144: 107638.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.107638]
[5]
Hu D, Zhao Y, Wu T, Li Z, Yu Y, Wang J. The complete performance map of gas wave ejector and analysis on the va-riation laws and limitation of performance. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2020; 142(2): 021012.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4045219]
[6]
D.B. Spalding, A Note on Pressure Equalizers and Dividers, Power Jets (Research and Development) Ltd., 1958 Report, No. 2251/Px 3.
[7]
Kentfield JAC. The performance of pressure-exchange dividers and equalizers. J Basic Eng 1969; 91(3): 361-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3571118]
[8]
Kentfield JAC. An examination of the performance of pressure exchanger equalisers and dividers 1963.
[9]
Akbari P, Nalim R, Mueller N. A review of wave rotor technology and its applications. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2006; 128(4): 717-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2204628]
[10]
Kharazi AA, Akbari P, Müller N. Implementation of 3-Port condensing wave rotors in R718 cycles. J Energy Resour Technol 2006; 128(4): 325-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2131886]
[11]
Zhao W, Hu D, Liu P, et al. The port width and position determination for gas wave ejector. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2012; 134(6): 064502.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4005982]
[12]
Zhao Y, Li H, Hu D. Performance experiments with a gas wave ejector equipped with curved channels and an analysis of the influence of channel angles. RSC Advances 2022; 12(27): 17294-311.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D2RA02577A] [PMID: 35765432]
[13]
Zhao Y, Li H, Hu D, Liu M, Feng Q. Study on the performance of collaborative production mode for gas wave ejector. Sustainability 2022; 14(12): 7261.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14127261]
[14]
Chan S, Liu H, Xing F, Song H. Wave rotor design method with three steps including experimental validation. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2018; 140(11): 111201.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4038815]
[15]
Zhao W, Hu D, Liu P, Dai Y, Rong C, Zhao J. Influence of port angle on performance of gas wave ejector and predic-tion for optimal angle. CIESC J 2012; 63: 6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.02.033]
[16]
Hu D, Li R, Liu P, Zhao J. The design and influence of port arrangement on an improved wave rotor refrigerator per-formance. Appl Therm Eng 2016; 107: 207-17.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.168]
[17]
LI ZH. ZHAO YM, JI YW. Design and performance study of forward flow channel wave rotor for gas wave injection. J Dalian Univ Technol 2020; 60(6): 577-83.
[18]
Tüchler S, Copeland CD. Numerical optimisation of a micro-wave rotor turbine using a quasi-two-dimensional CFD model and a hybrid algorithm. Shock Waves 2021; 31(3): 271-300.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00193-020-00979-4]
[19]
F.R. Menter, Y. Egorov. The scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. Part 1: theory and model description. Flow Turbul Combus 2010; 85(1): 113-38.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-1095]
[20]
a) Numerical Fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design. Springer 2008; 97: p. 261-70.;
b) Egorov Y, Menter F. Development and application of SST-SAS turbulence model in the desider project.Advances in Hybrid RANS-LES Modeling. Springer 2008; 97: p. 261-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77815-8_27]
[21]
Kurec K, Piechna J, Gumowski K. Investigations on unsteady flow within a stationary passage of a pressure wave ex-changer, by means of PIV measurements and CFD calculations. Appl Therm Eng 2017; 112: 610-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.142]
[22]
Zhao WJ. Examination of the Flow and Ejecting Performance of Pressure Oscillating Tube (PhD Disseration). Dalian University of Technology, China 2012.
[23]
Elbel S, Lawrence N. Review of recent developments in advanced ejector technology. Int J Refrig 2016; 62: 1-18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.10.031]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy