Abstract
Objective: Treatment of deep-seated cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains challenging for neurosurgeons or neuroradiologists. This study aims to review the experiences of one center in using multimodality treatment for deep-seated AVMs.
Methods: The AVM database of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University was searched, and 96 patients who were diagnosed with a deep-seated cerebral AVM between 2010 and 2020 were identified. The following information was collected and analyzed: patients’ clinical features, treatment modality used, posttreatment complications, AVM obliteration rate, rebleeding rate, and functional outcome during follow-up. The patients’ posttreatment modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores were split into two groups: good outcome (mRS score ≤ 2) and poor outcome (mRS score ≥ 3). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to test the predictors of clinical outcomes and AVM obliteration.
Results: Eighty-eight out of 96 patients (91.7%) presented with initial hemorrhaging. The pretreatment mRS score was ≤ 2 in 80 patients (88.3%) patients and ≥ 3 in 16 patients (16.7%). Limb weakness was present in 42 patients (43.8%). In this sample, 210 hemorrhages occurred during 2056 person-years before diagnosis, yielding an annual hemorrhage rate of 10.2% per person-year. Angiographic obliteration was achieved in 29 patients (30.2%). At the last follow-up, 80 patients (83.3%) had good clinical outcomes, whereas 16 (16.7%) had a deterioration in their clinical presentation following treatment. Multivariate analyses indicated that pretreatment limb weaknesses and a high Spetzler–Martin grade predicted poor clinical outcomes (P = 0.003 and 0.008, respectively). Fewer feeding arteries were a predictor for AVM obliteration (P = 0.034).
Conclusion: Good outcomes can be achieved through multimodal treatment of deep-seated AVMs. A single supplying artery is a predictor of AVM obliteration. Pretreatment limb weaknesses and high Spetzler-Martin grades predict poor clinical outcomes.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.98.4.0747] [PMID: 12691399]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.2.0285] [PMID: 9452237]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.03.033] [PMID: 24657255]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000145797.35968.ED]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0335-0] [PMID: 19415175]
[PMID: 3670541]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(92)90169-N] [PMID: 1440204]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-2140-z] [PMID: 30488257]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137202] [PMID: 32015188]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00861-6] [PMID: 31802150]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3349039] [PMID: 5901864]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2247] [PMID: 20966066]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318212bb34] [PMID: 21346657]
[PMID: 17353327]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)57015-3] [PMID: 17046674]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199905000-00031] [PMID: 10232532]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.11.006] [PMID: 26732284]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198808000-00014] [PMID: 3185881]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01401864] [PMID: 8237486]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-36200] [PMID: 12494356]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199507000-00004]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000176] [PMID: 24402496]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.12.JNS11542] [PMID: 22264181]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2404-9] [PMID: 24671157]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3497] [PMID: 23557955]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2012-010603]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/159101991301900104] [PMID: 23472720]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318276b2c0] [PMID: 23096412]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000982] [PMID: 26317676]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.JNS09830] [PMID: 21476804]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnis.2009.001289] [PMID: 21990597]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2018.2.JNS172511] [PMID: 30117771]