Generic placeholder image

Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1574-888X
ISSN (Online): 2212-3946

Meta-Analysis

A Bayesian Network Analysis of the Efficacy of Scaffolds and Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury Treatment

Author(s): Yang Wang* and Hanxiao Yi

Volume 18, Issue 4, 2023

Published on: 08 November, 2022

Page: [568 - 578] Pages: 11

DOI: 10.2174/1574888X18666221025155807

Price: $65

Abstract

Backgrond: Novel scaffolds and stem cells are alternatives for the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI), which causes life-long disability. However, there is a lack of synthesized evidence comparing different therapies.

Aim: To examine the efficacy of various treatments in achieving locomotor recovery in SCI animals. The PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 21st May 2021.

Methods: The data were extracted by one investigator under the surveillance of a referee according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement and stored in Microsoft Excel. All data were analysed using Bayesian network analysis with a consistency model. The selection was performed in strict accordance with the participant, intervention, comparison, outcome and study (PICOS) principle, as specifically stated in the methods section.

Results: A total of 387 eligible studies involving 11169 animals subjected to 5 different treatments were evaluated. Compared to placebo or no treatment, scaffolds (mean difference (MD), 2.04; 95% credible interval (CrI): 1.58 to 2.50), exosomes (MD, 3.46; 95% CrI: 3.07 to 3.86), stem cells (MD, 4.18; 95% CrI: 3.28 to 5.07), scaffolds in conjunction with stem cells (MD, 5.26; 95% CrI: 4.62 to 5.89), and scaffolds in conjunction with non-cell agents (MD, 4.88; 95% CrI: 4.21 to 5.54) led to significant recovery of locomotor function in SCI animals. No significant difference in the locomotor function score was observed between animals treated with stem cells and those treated with exosomes (MD, 0.71; 95% CrI: -0.25 to 3.05), between animals treated with scaffolds in conjunction with stem cells and those treated with scaffolds in conjunction with non-cell agents (MD, -0.38; 95% CrI: -1.24 to 0.49), or between animals treated with scaffolds in conjunction with non-cell agents and those treated with stem cells (MD, 0.71; 95% CrI: - 0.38 to 1.80).

Conclusion: Significant differences in the efficacy of various therapies in SCI animals were observed, and transplantation of scaffolds in conjunction with non-cell agents, scaffolds in conjunction with stem cells, and stem cells should be considered over transplantation of exosomes or scaffolds alone. Even though transplantation of scaffolds alone promoted locomotor function recovery in SCI animals, its use should be discouraged.

« Previous
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Torres EA, Redondo CE, Hernández J, Navarro X. Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells and olfactory ensheathing cells transplantation after spinal cord injury - a morphological and functional comparison in rats. Eur J Neurosci 2014; 39(10): 1704-17.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12542] [PMID: 24635194]
[2]
Stewart AN, Kendziorski G, Deak ZM, et al. Co-transplantation of mesenchymal and neural stem cells and overexpressing stromal-derived factor-1 for treating spinal cord injury. Brain Res 2017; 1672: 91-105.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.07.005] [PMID: 28734802]
[3]
Akbari M, Khaksari M, Rezaeezadeh RM, Mirzaee M, Nazari RM. Effect of chondroitinase ABC on inflammatory and oxidative response following spinal cord injury. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2017; 20(7): 806-12.
[PMID: 28852446]
[4]
Mothe AJ, Tam RY, Zahir T, Tator CH, Shoichet MS. Repair of the injured spinal cord by transplantation of neural stem cells in a hyaluronan-based hydrogel. Biomaterials 2013; 34(15): 3775-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.002] [PMID: 23465486]
[5]
Aras Y, Sabanci PA, Kabatas S, et al. The effects of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation during the acute and subacute phases following spinal cord injury. Turk Neurosurg 2016; 26(1): 127-39.
[PMID: 26768879]
[6]
Ahuja CS, Wilson JR, Nori S, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017; 3(1): 17018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.18] [PMID: 28447605]
[7]
Li LM, Huang LL, Jiang XC, Chen JC, OuYang HW, Gao JQ. Transplantation of BDNF gene recombinant mesenchymal stem Cel ls and adhesive peptide-modified hydrogel scaffold for spinal cord repair. Curr Gene Ther 2018; 18(1): 29-39.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1566523218666180413150023] [PMID: 29651947]
[8]
Wang Y, Lai X, Wu D, Liu B, Wang N, Rong L. Umbilical mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes facilitate spinal cord functional recovery through the miR-199a-3p/145-5p-mediated NGF/TrkA signaling pathway in rats. Stem Cell Res Ther 2021; 12(1): 117.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02148-5] [PMID: 33579361]
[9]
Li R, Zhao K, Ruan Q, Meng C, Yin F. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal microRNA-124-3p attenuates neurological damage in spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury by downregulating Ern1 and promoting M2 macrophage polarization. Arthritis Res Ther 2020; 22(1): 75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-2146-x] [PMID: 32272965]
[10]
Takahashi A, Nakajima H, Uchida K, et al. Comparison of mesenchymal stromal cells isolated from murine adipose tissue and bone marrow in the treatment of spinal cord injury. Cell Transplant 2018; 27(7): 1126-39.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689718780309] [PMID: 29947256]
[11]
Huang JH, Xu Y, Yin XM, Lin FY. Exosomes derived from miR-126-modified MSCs promote angiogenesis and neurogenesis and attenuate apoptosis after spinal cord injury in rats. Neuroscience 2020; 424: 133-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.043] [PMID: 31704348]
[12]
Wang J, Rong Y, Ji C, et al. MicroRNA-421-3p-abundant small extracellular vesicles derived from M2 bone marrow-derived macrophages attenuate apoptosis and promote motor function recovery via inhibition of mTOR in spinal cord injury. J Nanobiotechnology 2020; 18(1): 72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-020-00630-5] [PMID: 32404105]
[13]
Yuan X, Wu Q, Wang P, et al. Exosomes derived from pericytes improve microcirculation and protect blood–spinal cord barrier after spinal cord injury in mice. Front Neurosci 2019; 13: 319.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00319] [PMID: 31040762]
[14]
Rao JS, Zhao C, Zhang A, et al. NT3-chitosan enables de novo regeneration and functional recovery in monkeys after spinal cord injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018; 115(24): E5595-604.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804735115] [PMID: 29844162]
[15]
Liu W, Rong Y, Wang J, et al. Exosome-shuttled miR-216a-5p from hypoxic preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells repair traumatic spinal cord injury by shifting microglial M1/M2 polarization. J Neuroinflamm 2020; 17(1): 47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-1726-7] [PMID: 32019561]
[16]
Cizkova D, Novotna I, Slovinska L, et al. Repetitive intrathecal catheter delivery of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells improves functional recovery in a rat model of contusive spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28(9): 1951-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2010.1413] [PMID: 20822464]
[17]
An H, Li Q, Wen J. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated thermal-responsive hydrogel network bridges combined photo-plasmonic nanoparticulate system for the treatment of urinary bladder dysfunction after spinal cord injury. J Photochem Photobiol B 2020; 203111741
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111741] [PMID: 31901721]
[18]
Chen X, Wu J, Sun R, et al. Tubular scaffold with microchannels and an H-shaped lumen loaded with bone marrow stromal cells promotes neuroregeneration and inhibits apoptosis after spinal cord injury. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2020; 14(3): 397-411.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.2996] [PMID: 31821733]
[19]
Cao Z, Yao S, Xiong Y, et al. Directional axonal regrowth induced by an aligned fibrin nanofiber hydrogel contributes to improved motor function recovery in canine L2 spinal cord injury. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2020; 31(5): 40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06375-9] [PMID: 32318825]
[20]
Patist CM, Mulder MB, Gautier SE, Maquet V, Jérôme R, Oudega M. Freeze-dried poly(d,l-lactic acid) macroporous guidance scaffolds impregnated with brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the transected adult rat thoracic spinal cord. Biomaterials 2004; 25(9): 1569-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00503-9] [PMID: 14697859]
[21]
Yi H, Wang Y. A meta-analysis of exosome in the treatment of spinal cord injury. Open Med 2021; 16(1): 1043-60.
[22]
Luo L, Albashari AA, Wang X, et al. Effects of transplanted heparin-poloxamer hydrogel combining dental pulp stem cells and bFGF on spinal cord injury repair. Stem Cells Int 2018; 20182398521
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2398521] [PMID: 29765407]
[23]
Li X, Tan J, Xiao Z, et al. Transplantation of hUC-MSCs seeded collagen scaffolds reduces scar formation and promotes functional recovery in canines with chronic spinal cord injury. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1): 43559.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep43559] [PMID: 28262732]
[24]
Liu H, Xu X, Tu Y, et al. Engineering microenvironment for endogenous neural regeneration after spinal cord injury by reassembling extracellular matrix. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2020; 12(15): 17207-19.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b19638] [PMID: 32207300]
[25]
Liu J, Chen J, Liu B, et al. Acellular spinal cord scaffold seeded with mesenchymal stem cells promotes long-distance axon regeneration and functional recovery in spinal cord injured rats. J Neurol Sci 2013; 325(1-2): 127-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2012.11.022] [PMID: 23317924]
[26]
Onuma UM, Bhatt K, Hirai T, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells combined with a honeycomb collagen sponge facilitate neurite elongation in vitro and neural restoration in the hemisected rat spinal cord. Cell Transplant 2015; 24(7): 1283-97.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096368914X682134] [PMID: 24911956]
[27]
Li X, Han J, Zhao Y, et al. Functionalized collagen scaffold implantation and cAMP administration collectively facilitate spinal cord regeneration. Acta Biomater 2016; 30: 233-45.
[28]
Li ML, Min H, Xin C, et al. Peptide-tethered hydrogel scaffold promotes recovery from spinal cord transection via synergism with mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017; 9(4): 3330-42.
[29]
Liu W, Xu B, Xue W, et al. A functional scaffold to promote the migration and neuronal differentiation of neural stem/progenitor cells for spinal cord injury repair. Biomaterials 2020; 243119941
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119941] [PMID: 32172034]
[30]
Liu D, Jiang T, Cai W, et al. An in situ gelling drug delivery system for improved recovery after spinal cord injury. Adv Healthc Mater 2016; 5(12): 1513-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600055] [PMID: 27113454]
[31]
Ning G, Tang L, Wu Q, et al. Human umbilical cord blood stem cells for spinal cord injury: Early transplantation results in better local angiogenesis. Regen Med 2013; 8(3): 271-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/rme.13.26] [PMID: 23627822]
[32]
Nemati SN, Jabbari R, Hajinasrollah M, et al. Transplantation of adult monkey neural stem cells into a contusion spinal cord injury model in rhesus macaque monkeys. Cell J 2014; 16(2): 117-30.
[PMID: 24567941]
[33]
Nazemi Z, Nourbakhsh MS, Kiani S, et al. Co-delivery of minocycline and paclitaxel from injectable hydrogel for treatment of spinal cord injury. J Control Release 2020; 321: 145-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.009] [PMID: 32035190]
[34]
Wang Y, Yi H, Song Y. The safety of MSC therapy over the past 15 years: A meta-analysis. Stem Cell Res Ther 2021; 12(1): 545.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02609-x] [PMID: 34663461]
[35]
Yang Y, Cao TT, Tian ZM, et al. Subarachnoid transplantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell in rodent model with subacute incomplete spinal cord injury: Preclinical safety and efficacy study. Exp Cell Res 2020; 395(2)112184
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112184] [PMID: 32707134]
[36]
Vaquero J, Zurita M, Rico MA, et al. Intrathecal administration of autologous mesenchymal stromal cells for spinal cord injury: Safety and efficacy of the 100/3 guideline. Cytotherapy 2018; 20(6): 806-19.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.03.032] [PMID: 29853256]
[37]
Albu S, Kumru H, Coll R, et al. Clinical effects of intrathecal administration of expanded Wharton jelly mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with chronic complete spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled study. Cytotherapy 2021; 23(2): 146-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.08.008] [PMID: 32981857]
[38]
Morita T, Sasaki M, Kataoka SY, et al. Intravenous infusion of mesenchymal stem cells promotes functional recovery in a model of chronic spinal cord injury. Neuroscience 2016; 335: 221-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.08.037] [PMID: 27586052]
[39]
Mukhamedshina YO, Akhmetzyanova ER, Kostennikov AA, et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell application combined with fibrin matrix promotes structural and functional recovery following spinal cord injury in rats. Front Pharmacol 2018; 9: 343.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00343] [PMID: 29692732]
[40]
Cho SR, Kim YR, Kang HS, et al. Functional recovery after the transplantation of neurally differentiated mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Cell Transplant 2009; 18(12): 1359-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096368909X475329] [PMID: 20184788]
[41]
Fabela SO, Salgado CH, Medina TL, et al. Effect of the combined treatment of albumin with plasma synthesised pyrrole polymers on motor recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury in rats. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2018; 29(1): 13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-6016-2] [PMID: 29285620]
[42]
Oda Y, Tani K, Asari Y, et al. Canine bone marrow stromal cells promote functional recovery in mice with spinal cord injury. J Vet Med Sci 2014; 76(6): 905-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.13-0587] [PMID: 24561315]
[43]
Sun Y, Yang C, Zhu X, et al. 3D printing collagen/chitosan scaffold ameliorated axon regeneration and neurological recovery after spinal cord injury. J Biomed Mater Res A 2019; 107(9): 1898-908.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36675] [PMID: 30903675]
[44]
Alexanian AR, Fehlings MG, Zhang Z, Maiman DJ. Transplanted neurally modified bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote tissue protection and locomotor recovery in spinal cord injured rats. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25(9): 873-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968311416823] [PMID: 21844281]
[45]
Zhang C, He X, Li H. Effects of chondroitinase ABC combined with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells transplantation on repair of spinal cord injury in rats. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2013; 27(5): 541-6.
[PMID: 23879089]
[46]
Pritchard CD, Slotkin JR, Yu D, et al. Establishing a model spinal cord injury in the African green monkey for the preclinical evaluation of biodegradable polymer scaffolds seeded with human neural stem cells. J Neurosci Methods 2010; 188(2): 258-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.02.019] [PMID: 20219534]
[47]
Xiao Z, Tang F, Zhao Y, et al. Significant improvement of acute complete spinal cord injury patients diagnosed by a combined criteria implanted with neuroregen scaffolds and mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Transplant 2018; 27(6): 907-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689718766279] [PMID: 29871514]
[48]
Mulroy SJ, Thompson L, Kemp B, et al. Strengthening and Optimal Movements For Painful Shoulders (STOMPS) in chronic spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther 2011; 91(3): 305-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100182] [PMID: 21292803]
[49]
Mohammad GP, Tiraihi T, Delshad A, Arabkheradmand J, Taheri T. Improvement of contusive spinal cord injury in rats by co-transplantation of gamma-aminobutyric acid-ergic cells and bone marrow stromal cells. Cytotherapy 2013; 15(9): 1073-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.05.002] [PMID: 23806239]
[50]
Ryu HH, Kang BJ, Park SS, et al. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells derived from fat, bone marrow, Wharton’s jelly, and umbilical cord blood for treating spinal cord injuries in dogs. J Vet Med Sci 2012; 74(12): 1617-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.12-0065] [PMID: 22878503]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy