Abstract
Objective: We investigated the factors associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow artifacts on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging in patients with carotid artery (CA) stenosis.
Methods: Each CSF artifact grade was defined by comparing the highest intensity in a given region of interest (ROI) to those in reference ROIs, as follows: higher than the intensity of normal white matter in the centrum semiovale = 2 points; equal to or less than the white matter, and higher than CSF = 1 point; and equal to CSF = 0. CSF flow scores in eight sites were measured and added to the total score (0 -16). The prevalences of each finding, specifically white matter lesions, CA stenoses and brain atrophy, were compared using multivariate logistic regression models.
Results: We evaluated the findings in 54 patients with CA stenosis treated by CA stenting (CAS) and 200 adults with no history of neurological disorders (control group). Adjusted by stroke risk factors, a CSF flow score ≤ 11 was positively associated with CA stenosis, heart rate > 70 / min, and brain atrophy, and negatively with the female gender. The score was 12.8 ± 1.8 in the control group and 12.0 ± 2.0 in CA stenosis group after CAS, which was significantly higher than before CAS (10.4 ± 2.8, p<0.001).
Conclusion: The CSF flow score was associated with female gender, brain atrophy, heart rate, and severe CA stenosis, and was found to be elevated after revascularization.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30318-1] [PMID: 30353860]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1592-13.2013] [PMID: 24227727]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X17737984] [PMID: 29039724]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-017-0074-1] [PMID: 28950883]
[PMID: 10730642]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2018-0294] [PMID: 31068544]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199811123392002] [PMID: 9811916]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.149.2.351] [PMID: 3496763]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c34a7d] [PMID: 19933977]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.7.1183] [PMID: 9203460]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.04.035] [PMID: 23800499]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.05.011] [PMID: 23800492]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.113.000261] [PMID: 23963757]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.12431] [PMID: 24712717]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.59.3.321] [PMID: 12177363]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002377] [PMID: 26994127]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.179] [PMID: 27857119]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1073] [PMID: 30167649]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311873] [PMID: 30571170]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.5.99] [PMID: 17008766]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000049143] [PMID: 11901236]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2009.172072] [PMID: 19710048]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1241224] [PMID: 24136970]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.07.013] [PMID: 28987681]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4040401] [PMID: 30003260]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.337] [PMID: 25165048]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.119] [PMID: 26195256]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14283] [PMID: 29266273]