Abstract
Palliative care model can be carried out at home, in the community, or in long-term home care. Home visits in palliative care have an important role in providing continuity of care and psychosocial support to both the patient and their parents/caretakers. This study is aimed to determine the impact of home visit program to the frequency of emergency room (ER) admissions in children with cancer.
Methods: Randomized controlled trial of 60 pediatric patients with malignancies who were given palliative care (a 3-months home visit) and those who were not was conducted. Patients were children with cancer aged 2-18 years old. Emergency room admissions from the last three months were recorded before patients were enrolled. A two-way communication between a trained health worker and patients with or without their parents were conducted as the intervention. Interventions were given in six sessions (1 session every 2 weeks). During study period, ER admissions were recorded further. Data was analyzed using bivariate analysis, OR calculations were performed.
Results: In the intervention group, 11 children (36.7%) had fewer ER admissions, while 4 (13.3%) had more and 15 children (50%) had constant ER admissions, respectively. Meanwhile, only 2 children (7.7%) were found to have fewer ER admissions in the control group. Others in this group have varying results, 11 children (42.3%) were found to have more admissions to the ER and 13 children (50%) had constant ER admissions. In the intervention group, ER admissions were reduced by 10 visits, while in the control group, the admissions were increased by 16 visits (OR 4.77, 95% CI 1.29-17.65; p = 0.018).
Conclusion: Palliative home visit provides care matched to patient and family needs, trained parents to be skillful in managing child, and enabling avoidance of unnecessary hospitalizations (4.7 times).
Keywords: home visit, emergency admission, palliative, pediatric
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0312] [PMID: 25480826]
[PMID: 26231808]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1404684] [PMID: 26287850]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.150170] [PMID: 25709182]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3693] [PMID: 24906714]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025180] [PMID: 30670524]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.04.011] [PMID: 19615632]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.016] [PMID: 17482035]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2013.0153] [PMID: 24225013]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216313517283] [PMID: 24367058]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599400.001.0001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0267-z] [PMID: 29298714]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009231.pub2]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.07.015] [PMID: 24246788]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1478-8] [PMID: 22555446]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2015.65983] [PMID: 27336074]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2015.0275] [PMID: 26652056]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1907] [PMID: 30525302]