Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) is one of the main causes of cancer-related death in women worldwide. It is necessary to find methods for prognosis and early detection of BC. MicroRNAs inhibit the expression of special target genes at the post-transcriptional stage and have a fundamental role in various cancers. They function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors. MiR-125a- 5p acts as a tumor suppressor in some cancers through a signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) suppression. STAT3 is activated in response to cytokines and growth factors, affecting the transcription of target genes.
Objective: We examined the association between miR-125a-5p and STAT3 expression levels in breast cancer patients for the first time through a case-control study on an Iranian population.
Methods: Total RNAs were extracted from breast cancer and healthy tissues using TRIzol Reagent. Complementary DNA synthesis was performed, and Real-time PCR was done using miR-125a and STAT3-specific primers. GAPDH and U48 genes were used as internal controls. Statistical analysis of the results was conducted by SPSS v.19.0 software.
Results: We obtained a significant association between miR-125a-5p down-regulation and breast cancer disease (0.4333 in patients vs. 1.656 in controls, p-value = 0.009). STAT3 expression was significantly up-regulated in BC samples relative to healthy subjects (1.324 vs. 0.6557, respectively) and p-value <0.0001.
Conclusion: We investigated that decreased miR-125a-5p expression levels were significantly associated with increased STAT3 expression in BC tissues. Therefore, the expression changes of miR- 125a-5p can be an important potential biomarker for early diagnosis of breast cancer. Also, the miRNA molecule may have serious therapeutic potential.
Keywords: Oncogenes, microRNAs, MiR-125a-5p, STAT3, Gene expression, Breast cancer
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21203] [PMID: 24114568]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2019.3.7]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/lhhs.2021.80008]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168412] [PMID: 28056026]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10555-009-9188-5] [PMID: 20012925]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M609383200] [PMID: 17110380]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-318] [PMID: 20569443]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116759] [PMID: 25560389]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2017.04.006] [PMID: 28408353]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00438-013-0757-5] [PMID: 23783428]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S92314] [PMID: 26719710]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2015.07.036] [PMID: 26297542]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2132] [PMID: 21220473]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2674] [PMID: 25504437]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1010428317697579] [PMID: 28631574]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2013.12.005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106210] [PMID: 31972425]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M008821200] [PMID: 11150296]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11111815] [PMID: 31752278]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.930] [PMID: 23531921]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001813-200507000-00002] [PMID: 15930886]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.075] [PMID: 16081048]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2012.1568] [PMID: 22842992]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09674845.2019.1674470] [PMID: 31575334]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.47203] [PMID: 32792861]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2019.06.004] [PMID: 31325708]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.102276] [PMID: 31527306]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15809] [PMID: 28445974]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404100101] [PMID: 15249664]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207383] [PMID: 15116091]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1593/neo.07971] [PMID: 18320073]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-5-14] [PMID: 20478049]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2012.546] [PMID: 23178493]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/13543776.2011.539205] [PMID: 21114420]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2015.December.22.17] [PMID: 26782438]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.4457] [PMID: 26389681]