Generic placeholder image

Recent Advances in Electrical & Electronic Engineering

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2352-0965
ISSN (Online): 2352-0973

Research Article

Transformer Fault Diagnosis Based on an Improved Sine Cosine Algorithm and BP Neural Network

Author(s): Jiatang Cheng, Zhichao Feng and Yan Xiong*

Volume 15, Issue 6, 2022

Published on: 19 September, 2022

Page: [502 - 510] Pages: 9

DOI: 10.2174/2352096515666220819141443

Price: $65

conference banner
Abstract

Background: The operation state evaluation and fault location of the transformer is one of the technical bottlenecks restricting the safe power grid operation.

Methods: A hybrid intelligent method based on the Improved Sine Cosine Algorithm and BP neural network (ISCA-BP) is developed to improve the accuracy of transformer fault diagnosis. First, the cloud model is introduced into the Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA) to determine the conversion parameter of each individual to balance the global search and local exploitation capabilities. After that, six popular benchmark functions are used to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. Finally, based on the dissolved gas analysis technology, the improved SCA algorithm is employed to find the optimal weight and threshold parameters of the BP neural network, and the transformer fault classification model is established.

Results: Simulation results indicate that the improved SCA algorithm exhibits strong competitiveness. Furthermore, compared with the BP neural network optimized by the Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA-BP) and BP neural network, the ISCA-BP method can significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of transformer faults.

Conclusion: The proposed intelligent method can provide a valuable reference idea for transformer fault classification.

Keywords: Transformer, fault, diagnosis, sine cosine algorithm, cloud model, BP neural network, simeelation.

« Previous
Graphical Abstract

[1]
H.A. Illias, R.C. Xin, and A.H. Abu Bakar, "Hybrid modified evolutionary particle swarm optimisation-time varying acceleration coefficient artificial neural network for power transformer fault diagnosis", Measurement, vol. 90, pp. 94-102, 2016.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.052]
[2]
Y.W. Zhang, B. Feng, Y. Chen, W.H. Liao, and C.X. Guo, "Fault diagnosis method for oil-immersed transformer based on XGBoost optimized by genetic algorithm", Electric Power Auto. Equip., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 200-206, 2021.
[3]
M. Elsisi, M.Q. Tran, K. Mahmoud, D.E.A. Mansour, M. Lehtonen, and M.M.F. Darwish, "Effective IOT based deep learning platform for online fault diagnosis of power transformers against cyberattacks and data uncertainties", Measurement, vol. 190, p. 110686, 2022.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110686]
[4]
M.Q. Tran, M.K. Liu, Q.V. Tran, and T.K. Nguyen, "Effective fault diagnosis based on wavelet and convolutional attention neural network for induction motors", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 71, p. 3501613, 2022.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3139706]
[5]
S. Samonto, S. Kar, S. Pal, and A.A. Sekh, "Fuzzy logic based multistage relaying model for cascaded intelligent fault protection scheme", Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 184, p. 106341, 2020.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106341]
[6]
S. Samonto, S. Kar, S. Pal, A.A. Sekh, O. Castillo, and G.K. Park, "Best fit membership function for designing fuzzylogic controller aided intelligent overcurrent faultprotection scheme", Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., vol. 31, no. 5, p. e12875, 2021.
[7]
Y.C. Zhou, X.H. Yang, L.Y. Tao, and L. Yang, "Transformer fault diagnosis model based on improved gray wolf optimizer and probabilistic neural network", Energies, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 3029, 2021.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14113029]
[8]
X. Xu, B.T. Jiang, and W. Cao, "“Application of grasshopper optimization neural network in power transformer fault diagnosis”, Power Sys", Clean Energy, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 17-23, 2021.
[9]
P.C. Yan, C.Y. Zhang, K.F. Mei, F.X. Chen, and Y.H. Wang, "Research on fault diagnosis of transformer based on laser induced fluorescence technology", J. Mol. Struct., vol. 1258, p. 132645, 2022.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.132645]
[10]
Q.C. Fan, F. Yu, and M. Xuan, "Transformer fault diagnosis method based on improved whale optimization algorithm to optimize support vector machine", Energy Rep., vol. 7, pp. 856-866, 2021.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.188]
[11]
X.H. Yang, W.H. Chen, A.Y. Li, C.S. Yang, Z.H. Xie, and H.Y. Dong, "BA-PNN-based methods for power transformer fault diagnosis", Adv. Eng. Inform., vol. 39, pp. 178-185, 2019.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.01.001]
[12]
J. Wu, H.H. Ding, X.H. Ma, B.Y. Yan, and X.Y. Wang, "Application of improved adaptive bee colony optimization algorithm in transformer fault diagnosis", Power Sys. Protect. Control, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 174-180, 2020.
[13]
S. Mirjalili, "SCA: A sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems", Knowl. Base. Syst., vol. 96, pp. 120-133, 2016.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.022]
[14]
W.L. Fu, K. Wang, C.S. Li, X. Li, Y.H. Li, and H. Zhong, "Vibration trend measurement for a hydropower generator based on optimal variational mode decomposition and an LSSVM improved with chaotic sine cosine algorithm optimization", Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 30, pp. 1-15, 2019.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aaf377]
[15]
D.R. Nayak, R. Dash, B. Majhi, and S.H. Wang, "Combining extreme learning machine with modified sine cosine algorithm for detection of pathological brain", Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 68, pp. 366-380, 2018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.04.009]
[16]
N. Singh, and J. Kaur, "Hybridizing sine cosine algorithm with harmony search strategy for optimization design problems", Soft Comput., vol. 25, pp. 11053-11075, 2021.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05841-y]
[17]
E.V. Altay, and B. Alatas, "Differential evolution and sine cosine algorithm based novel hybrid multi objective approaches for numerical association rule mining", Inf. Sci., vol. 554, pp. 198-221, 2021.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.12.055]
[18]
S. Gupta, and K. Deep, "Improved sine cosine algorithm with crossover scheme for global optimization", Knowl. Base. Syst., vol. 165, pp. 374-406, 2019.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.008]
[19]
S. Gupta, K. Deep, and A.P. Engelbrecht, "A memory guided sine cosine algorithm for global optimization", Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 93, p. 103718, 2020.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103718]
[20]
Y. Li, Y.R. Zhao, and J.S. Liu, "Dimension by dimension dynamic sine cosine algorithm for global optimization problems", Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 98, p. 106933, 2021.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106933]
[21]
R.M. Rizk-Allah, "A quantum based sine cosine algorithm for solving general systems of nonlinear equations", Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 54, pp. 3939-3990, 2021.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09944-0]
[22]
Y. Ma, W.J. Tian, and Y.Y. Fan, "Adaptive quantum behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm based on cloud model", PR & AI, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 787-793, 2013.
[23]
L. Abualigah, and A. Diabat, "Advances in sine cosine algorithm: A comprehensive survey", Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 54, pp. 2567-2608, 2021.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09909-3]
[24]
W.Y. Guo, Y. Wang, F. Dai, and T. Liu, "Alternating sine cosine algorithm based on elite chaotic search strategy", Control and Decision, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1654-1662, 2019.
[25]
J.T. Cheng, and Y. Xiong, "Parameter control based cuckoo search algorithm for numerical optimization", Neural Process. Lett., 2022.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10758-0]
[26]
B.Y. Yin, Z.L. Guo, Z.P. Liang, and X.Z. Yue, "Improved gravitational search algorithm with crossover", Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 66, pp. 505-516, 2018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.06.001]
[27]
P.f. Liu, and W. Zhang, "A fault diagnosis intelligent algorithm based on improved BP neural network", Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell., vol. 33, no. 9, p. 1959028, 2019.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218001419590286]
[28]
J.T. Cheng, and Y. Xiong, "Fault diagnosis of wind turbine gearbox based on improved QPSO algorithm", Recent Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 277-283, 2019.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2352096511666180629152127]
[29]
B. Subudhi, and D. Jena, "Differential evolution and levenberg marquardt trained neural network scheme for nonlinear system identification", Neural Process. Lett., vol. 27, pp. 285-296, 2008.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11063-008-9077-x]
[30]
X.Y. Han, G.M. Wang, J.H. Liu, L.J. Yang, and P.G. Zhang, "Power consumption model of permanent magnet direct drive belt conveyor system based on GACO-BP", Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell., vol. 35, no. 16, p. 2159051, 2021.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218001421590515]
[31]
Y. Xiong, J.T. Cheng, and L.P. Zhang, "Neighborhood learning-based cuckoo search algorithm for global optimization", Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell., vol. 36, no. 5, p. 2251006, 2022.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218001422510065]
[32]
J.T. Cheng, and Y. Xiong, "An enhanced cuckoo search algorithm and its application in transformer fault diagnosis", Recent Pat. Eng., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 209-214, 2018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1872212112666171109142818]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy