Abstract
Background: Reperfusion Injury Acute ischemic stroke is increasing in people recently and Musk, as a commonly used Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), has been suggested as a potential agent against acute ischemic stroke, but the efficacies and underlying mechanisms of it remain unknown.
Objective: This study was aimed to test the hypotheses that volatile compounds of musk could attenuate nerve injury and identify the bioactive compounds and potential mechanisms of Musk.
Methods: Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model in vivo in Sprague-Dawley rats (SD rats) was used to test this hypothesis. Collecting ingredients of Musk and their related targets were discerned from the Gas chromatography-olfactory mass spectrometry (GC-O-MS) experiment. Then the potential mechanisms and targets of the compounds were searched by network pharmacology techniques. Finally, the pathway was verified by Western Bolt (WB).
Results: First, Musk treatment significantly up-regulated the relative levels of AKT1, PI3KA, and VEGFA in the hippocampus, and improved the sport functions in the post-MCAO ischemic rats in vivo. Next, twenty potential flavor active compounds were recognized by GC-O-MS. A total of 89 key targets including HIF-1, PIK3CA, TNF signaling pathway, and VEGF were identified. AKT1, HIF1A, PIK3CA, and VEGFA were viewed as the most important genes, which were validated by molecular docking simulation.
Conclusion: The Volatile compounds of musk can attenuate nerve injury and improving post-cerebral ischemic exercise functions by HIF1A pathways, and the combined data provide novel insight for Musk volatile compounds developed as new drug for improving reperfusion injury in acute ischemic stroke.
Keywords: Musk, reperfusion injury, GC-O-MS, GO enrichment, KEGG enrichment, molecular docking.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098] [PMID: 27145936]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649503] [PMID: 29791947]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000074] [PMID: 26123479]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.008] [PMID: 26455456]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.3058] [PMID: 25871671]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13020-021-00457-8] [PMID: 34147113]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4063180] [PMID: 32714405]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1493-2] [PMID: 27931220]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055780] [PMID: 23372854]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.037] [PMID: 30361015]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113139] [PMID: 31794744]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2020.1797722] [PMID: 32677581]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep03981] [PMID: 24496233]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20071661] [PMID: 30987181]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10102166] [PMID: 34685975]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods7070098] [PMID: 29954052]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-019-0650-3] [PMID: 31891159]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz382] [PMID: 31106366]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.09.051] [PMID: 23142198]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820799116] [PMID: 30894481]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0359-2] [PMID: 28830434]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1037] [PMID: 29126136]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1205] [PMID: 25428349]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1875-5364(13)60037-0] [PMID: 23787177]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20202583] [PMID: 33146673]
[PMID: 33125081]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389450119666181022153016] [PMID: 30360733]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157340911795677602] [PMID: 21534921]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02647] [PMID: 30519240]
[PMID: 1335138]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011383] [PMID: 20614021]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016554] [PMID: 28522637]
[PMID: 19873786]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308022] [PMID: 27340273]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000232563] [PMID: 19672073]
[PMID: 30836371]