Generic placeholder image

Current Bioinformatics

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1574-8936
ISSN (Online): 2212-392X

Research Article

Decoding Seven Basic Odors by Investigating Pharmacophores and Molecular Features of Odorants

Author(s): Anju Sharma, Rajnish Kumar and Pritish Kumar Varadwaj*

Volume 17, Issue 8, 2022

Published on: 22 August, 2022

Page: [759 - 774] Pages: 16

DOI: 10.2174/1574893617666220519111254

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: The odors we perceive are primarily the result of a mixture of odorants. There can be one or multiple odors associated with an odorant. Several studies have attempted to link odorant physicochemical properties to specific olfactory perception; however, no universal rule that can determine how and to what extent molecular properties affect odor perception exists.

Objective: This study aims to identify important and common features of odorants with seven basic odors (floral, fruity, minty, nutty, pungent, sweet, woody) to comprehend the complex topic of odors better.

Methods: We adopted an in-silico approach to study key and common odorants features with seven fundamental odors (floral, fruity, minty, nutty, pungent, sweet, and woody). A dataset of 1136 odorants having one of the odors was built and studied.

Results: A set of nineteen structural features has been proposed to identify seven fundamental odors rapidly. The findings also indicated associations between odors, and specific molecular features associated with each group of odorants and shared spatial distribution of odor features.

Conclusion: This study revealed olfactory associations, unique chemical properties linked with each set of odorants, and a common spatial distribution of odor features for considered odors.

Keywords: Molecular features, odor, odorants, odor network, pharmacophore, smell.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Sharma A, Kumar R, Aier I, Semwal R, Tyagi P, Varadwaj P. Sense of smell: Structural, functional, mechanistic advancements and challenges in human olfactory research. Curr Neuropharmacol 2019; 17(9): 891-911.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X17666181206095626] [PMID: 30520376]
[2]
Sharma A, Kumar R, Ranjta S, Varadwaj PK. SMILES to Smell: Decoding the structure-odor relationship of chemical compounds using the deep neural network approach. J Chem Inf Model 2021; 61(2): 676-88.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01288] [PMID: 33449694]
[3]
Genva M, Kenne Kemene T, Deleu M, Lins L, Fauconnier ML. Is it possible to predict the odor of a molecule on the basis of its structure? Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20(12): 3018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20123018] [PMID: 31226833]
[4]
Herrmann A. The Chemistry and Biology of Volatiles. Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons 2010.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470669532]
[5]
Nara K, Saraiva LR, Ye X, Buck LB. A large-scale analysis of odor coding in the olfactory epithelium. J Neurosci 2011; 31(25): 9179-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1282-11.2011] [PMID: 21697369]
[6]
Yoshii F. Structure-odor relations: A modern perspective Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis 2003; pp. 457-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203911457.ch13]
[7]
Goldstein N. Getting to know the odor compounds. Biocycle 2002; 43: 42-4.
[8]
Veithen A, Wilin F. Philippeau Magali, Chatelain P. OR1D2 is a broadly tuned human olfactory receptor. Chem Senses 2015; 262-3.
[9]
Block E. Molecular basis of mammalian odor discrimination: A status report. J Agric Food Chem 2018; 66(51): 13346-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04471] [PMID: 30453735]
[10]
Kraft P, Bajgrowicz JA, Denis C, Fráter G. Odds and Trends: Recent Developments in the Chemistry of Odorants Note on trademarks: Words which we know or have reason to believe constitute registered trademarks (R) are designated as such. However, neither the presence nor absence of such designation should be regarded as affecting the legal status of any trademark. Note on perfume analysis: The quoted percentages of perfume raw materials in market products are rounded figures. They are often derived from area percentages from the GC (FID) analysis, and are thus subject to analytical error. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2000; 39(17): 2980-3010.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20000901)39:17<2980:AID-ANIE2980>3.0.CO;2-#] [PMID: 11028024]
[11]
Zarzo M. The sense of smell: Molecular basis of odorant recognition. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2007; 82(3): 455-79.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00019.x] [PMID: 17624963]
[12]
Schiffman SS. Contributions to the physicochemical dimensions of odor: A psychophysical approach. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1974; 237(0): 164-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb49852.x] [PMID: 4529466]
[13]
Tromelin A, Koensgen F, Audouze K, Guichard E, Thomas-Danguin T. Exploring the characteristics of an aroma-blending mixture by investigating the network of shared odors and the molecular features of their related odorants. Molecules 2020; 25(13): 3032.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133032] [PMID: 32630789]
[14]
Castro JB, Ramanathan A, Chennubhotla CS. Categorical dimensions of human odor descriptor space revealed by non-negative matrix factorization. PLoS One 2013; 8(9): e73289.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073289] [PMID: 24058466]
[15]
Harini K, Sowdhamini R. Computational approaches for decoding select odorant-olfactory receptor interactions using mini-virtual screening. PLoS One 2015; 10(7): e0131077.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131077] [PMID: 26221959]
[16]
Rossiter KJ. Structureminus sign odor relationships. Chem Rev 1996; 96(8): 3201-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr950068a] [PMID: 11848858]
[17]
Licon CC, Bosc G, Sabri M, et al. Chemical features mining provides new descriptive structure-odor relationships. PLOS Comput Biol 2019; 15(4): e1006945.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006945] [PMID: 31022180]
[18]
Sharma A, Kumar R, Varadwaj PK. OBPred: Feature-fusion-based deep neural network classifier for odorant-binding protein prediction. Neural Comput Appl 2021; 33(24): 17633-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06347-2]
[19]
Sharma A, Saha BK, Kumar R, Varadwaj PK. OlfactionBase: A repository to explore odors, odorants, olfactory receptors and odorant-receptor interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50(D1): D678-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab763] [PMID: 34469532]
[20]
Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, et al. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003; 13(11): 2498-504.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303] [PMID: 14597658]
[21]
Mauri A. alvaDesc: A tool to calculate and analyze molecular descriptors and fingerprints. In: Ecotoxicological QSARs Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Roy K. New York: Humana. 2020.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0150-1_32]
[22]
Kumar R, Khan FU, Sharma A, et al. A deep neural network-based approach for prediction of mutagenicity of compounds. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2021; 28(34): 47641-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14028-9] [PMID: 33895950]
[23]
Younis H, Anwar MW, Khan MUG, Sikandar A, Bajwa UI. A new Sequential Forward Feature Selection (SFFS) algorithm for mining best topological and biological features to predict protein complexes from Protein-Protein Interaction Networks (PPINs). Interdiscip Sci 2021; 13(3): 371-88.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12539-021-00433-8] [PMID: 33959851]
[24]
Escanilla NS, Hellerstein L, Kleiman R, Kuang Z, Shull JD, Page D. Recursive feature elimination by sensitivity testing. Proc Int Conf Mach Learn Appl 2018; 2018; pp. 40-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00014]
[25]
Xia J, Sun L, Xu S, et al. A model using support vector machines recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) algorithm to classify whether COPD patients have been continuously managed according to GOLD guidelines. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2020; 15: 2779-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S271237] [PMID: 33177815]
[26]
Fan C, Zhang D, Zhang CH. On sample size of the kruskal-wallis test with application to a mouse peritoneal cavity study. Biometrics 2011; 67(1): 213-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01407.x] [PMID: 20345499]
[27]
Vetter TR. Fundamentals of research data and variables: The devil is in the details. Anesth Analg 2017; 125(4): 1375-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002370] [PMID: 28787341]
[28]
Li Y, Wei Y, Li B, Alterovitz G. Modified anderson-darling test-based target detector in non-homogenous environments. Sensors (Basel) 2014; 14(9): 16046-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140916046] [PMID: 25177800]
[29]
Cembrowski GS, Westgard JO, Conover WJ, Toren EC Jr. Statistical analysis of method comparison data. Testing normality. Am J Clin Pathol 1979; 72(1): 21-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/72.1.21] [PMID: 453107]
[30]
Aslam M, Sherwani RAK, Saleem M. Vague data analysis using neutrosophic Jarque-Bera test. PLoS One 2021; 16(12): e0260689.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260689] [PMID: 34855840]
[31]
Fan C, Zhang D. A note on power and sample size calculations for the Kruskal-Wallis test for ordered categorical data. J Biopharm Stat 2012; 22(6): 1162-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2011.578313] [PMID: 23075015]
[32]
Dixon SL, Smondyrev AM, Rao SN. PHASE: A novel approach to pharmacophore modeling and 3D database searching. Chem Biol Drug Des 2006; 67(5): 370-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0285.2006.00384.x] [PMID: 16784462]
[33]
Watts KS, Dalal P, Murphy RB, Sherman W, Friesner RA, Shelley JC. ConfGen: A conformational search method for efficient generation of bioactive conformers. J Chem Inf Model 2010; 50(4): 534-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci100015j] [PMID: 20373803]
[34]
Greenwood JR, Calkins D, Sullivan AP, Shelley JC. Towards the comprehensive, rapid, and accurate prediction of the favorable tautomeric states of drug-like molecules in aqueous solution. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2010; 24(6-7): 591-604.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-010-9349-1] [PMID: 20354892]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy