Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2405-5204
ISSN (Online): 2405-5212

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Research on Turbulent Drag Reduction of Surfactant-Polymer Mixed Solution Using Flow Visualization Technique

Author(s): Lehua Zheng, Entian Li*, Yang Liu, Liutong Fan and Shushi Zhao

Volume 15, Issue 2, 2022

Published on: 07 July, 2022

Page: [111 - 126] Pages: 16

DOI: 10.2174/2405520415666220509125624

open access plus

conference banner
Abstract

Objective: To explore the drag reduction effect of surfactant-polymer composite system in a turbulent flow.

Methods: The turbulent drag reduction experiment of the one-component solution and the composite solution was carried out in a rectangular pipeline platform, respectively. Moreover, Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) was utilized to measure the turbulent flow field of the drag-reducing flow.

Results: Experimental results show that the composite drag reduction system has a drag reduction gain effect in comparison with the one-component surfactant or polymer solution. Especially in the destroyed drag reduction zone, the composite drag reduction system has a strong shear resistance. When Polyacrylamide (PAM) is added, the Reynolds drag reduction range of Cetyltrimethylammonium Chloride (CTAC) solution is broadened and the drag reduction gain efficiency reaches 46%, which will provide favorable conditions for oil transportation and other industries.

Conclusion: Compared with a one-component CTAC solution, the mean velocity distribution of the composite solution moves up in the logarithmic-law layer, the velocity fluctuation peaks of the streamwise direction shift away from the inner wall of pipe, and the inhibition degree of the normal velocity fluctuation increases with the augment of PAM concentration. In contrast with water, the Reynolds shear stress of one-component CTAC solution and composite solution is reduced significantly, and the vortex structures in the region near the wall are suppressed dramatically with the decrease of vorticity intensity.

Keywords: Turbulent drag reduction, particle image velocimetry, surfactant, polymer, CTAC, turbulent flow field.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Hassanean MH, Awad ME, Marwan H, Bhran AA, Kaoud M. Studying the rheological properties and the influence of drag reduction on a waxy crude oil in pipeline flow. Egyptian J Petroleum 2016; 25(1): 39-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.02.013]
[2]
Asidin MA, Suali E, Jusnukin T, Lahin FA. Review on the applications and developments of drag reducing polymer in turbulent pipe flow. Chin J Chem Eng 2019; 27(8): 1921-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2019.03.003]
[3]
Bannai M, Kuwabara K, Itasaka H. Energy-saving in chilled-water supply system for clean room of semiconductor manufacturing plant. Trans Japan Soc Refrigerat Air Cond Eng 2012; 23(2): 133-43.
[4]
Myska J, Mik V. Application of a drag reducing surfactant in the heating circuit. Energy Build 2003; 35(8): 813-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00243-8]
[5]
Choi KS, Yang X, Clayton B, et al. Turbulent drag reduction using compliant surfaces. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci 1965; 453: 2229-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1997.0119]
[6]
Ptasinski PK, Nieuwstadt FTM, van den Brule BHAA, Hulsen MA. Experiments in turbulent pipe flow with polymer additives at maximum drag reduction. Flow Turbul Combus 2001; 66(2): 159-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017985826227]
[7]
Gasljevic K, Aguilar G, Matthys EF. An improved diameter scaling correlation for turbulent flow of drag-reducing poly-mer solutions. J Non-Newt Fluid Mech 1999; 84(2): 131-48.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(98)00155-4]
[8]
Jubran BA, Zurigat YH, Goosen MFA. Drag reducing agents in multiphase flow pipelines: Recent trends and future needs. Petrol Sci Technol 2005; 23(11-12): 1403-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/LFT-200038223]
[9]
Toms BA. Some observations on the flow of linear polymer solutions through straight tubes at large Reynolds numbers. Proc Cong Rheol 1948 1948; 135-41.
[10]
Baron A, Sibilla S. DNS of the turbulent channel flow of a dilute polymer solution. Appl Sci Res 1997; 59(4): 331-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1001170712700]
[11]
Moussa T, Tiu C. Factors affecting polymer degradation in turbulent pipe flow. Chem Eng Sci 1994; 49(10): 1681-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(93)E0029-C]
[12]
Soares EJ. Review of mechanical degradation and de-aggregation of drag reducing polymers in turbulent flows. J Non-Newt Fluid Mech 2020; 276: 104225.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2019.104225]
[13]
Virk PS, Merrill EW, Mickley HS, Smith KA, Mollo-Christensen EL. The Toms phenomenon: Turbulent pipe flow of dilute polymer solutions. J Fluid Mech 1967; 30(2): 305-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022112067001442]
[14]
White CM, Mungal MG. Mechanics and prediction of turbulent drag reduction with polymer additives. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2008; 40(1): 235-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102156]
[15]
Soares EJ. Effect of combined polymers on the loss of efficiency caused by mechanical degradation in drag reducing flows through straight tubes. Rheol Acta 2016; 55(7): 559-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00397-016-0927-6]
[16]
Habibpour M, Clark PE. Drag reduction behavior of hydrolyzed polyacrylamide/xanthan gum mixed polymer solu-tions. Petrol Sci 2017; 14(2): 412-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12182-017-0152-7]
[17]
Benzi R. A short review on drag reduction by polymers in wall bounded turbulence. Physica D 2010; 239(14): 1338-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2009.07.013]
[18]
Virk PS, Mickley HS, Smith KA. The ultimate asymptote and mean flow structure in Toms’ phenomenon. J Appl Mech 1970; 37(2): 488-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3408532]
[19]
Mohsenipour AA, Pal R. Drag reduction in turbulent pipeline flow of mixed nonionic polymer and cationic surfactant systems. Can J Chem Eng 2013; 91(1): 190-201.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.21618]
[20]
Hadri F, Guillou S. Drag reduction by surfactant in closed turbulent flow. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2010; 2(12): 6876-9.
[21]
Li P, Kawaguchi Y, Daisaka H, Yabe A, Hishida K, Maeda M. Heat transfer enhancement to the drag-reducing flow of surfactant solution in two-dimensional channel with mesh-screen inserts at the inlet. J Heat Transfer 2000; 123(4): 779-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.1370518]
[22]
Myska J, Stern P. Significance of shear induced structure in surfactants for drag reduction. Colloid Polym Sci 1998; 276(9): 816-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003960050315]
[23]
Tuan NA, Mizunuma H. High-shear drag reduction of surfactant solutions. J Non-Newt Fluid Mech 2013; 198: 71-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2013.05.002]]
[24]
Anthony O, Zana R. Interactions between water-soluble polymers and surfactants: Effect of the polymer hydrophobi-city. 1. hydrophilic polyelectrolytes. Langmuir 1996; 12(8): 1967-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la950817j]
[25]
Mohsenipour AA, Pal R. The role of surfactants in mechanical degradation of drag-reducing polymers. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013; 52(3): 1291-302.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie3024214]
[26]
Kawaguchi Y, Segawa T, Feng Z, Li P. Experimental study on drag-reducing channel flow with surfactant additives-spatial structure of turbulence investigated by PIV system. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2002; 23(5): 700-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-727X(02)00166-2]
[27]
Matras Z, Malcher T, Gzyl-Malcher B. The influence of polymer-surfactant aggregates on drag reduction. Thin Solid Films 2008; 516(24): 8848-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2007.11.057]
[28]
Mohsenipour AA, Pal R. Synergistic effects of anionic surfactant and nonionic polymer additives on drag reduction. Chem Eng Commun 2013; 200(7): 935-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2012.731661]
[29]
Pang M, Xie C, Zhang Z, Dai J. Experimental studies on drag reduction by coupled addition of nonionic polymer poly(ethylene oxide) and cationic surfactant cetyltrimethyl ammonium chloride. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 2018; 13(4): e2218.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/apj.2218]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
8
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy