Abstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that has become a major health issue in the modern era due to long-term health consequences. α-amylase and α-glucosidase are the key enzymes involved in the digestion of starchy foods, and the inhibition of these enzymes is regarded as a postprandial hyperglycemia control strategy.
Objective: The primary goal of this work is to examine the antioxidant activity as well as α- glucosidase inhibitory activity of Polygonatum verticillatum rhizomes via in vitro test.
Methods: The in vitro α-glucosidase inhibition activity was performed using p-nitrophenyl-α- Dglucopyranoside (PNPG) substrate. 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging assay was performed to estimate the antioxidant activity.
Results: The in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of Polygonatum verticillatum was investigated for the very first time. Of the three fractions and a crude extract, the ethyl acetate (EA) fraction disclosed potent inhibition activity against α-glucosidase enzyme with an IC50 value of 22.3 ± 0.1 μg/mL. Likewise, the IC50 values for dichloromethane (DCM) fraction and the crude extract against α- glucosidase were reported at 34 ± 0.1 μg/mL and 402.2 ± 0.2 μg/mL, respectively. Similarly, the EA fraction, crude extract, and DCM fraction disclosed promising antioxidant activity with IC50 = 55 ± 0.3 μg/mL, 171.5 ± 0.6 μg/mL, and 164.1 ± 3.4 μg/mL, respectively.
Conclusion: These findings concluded that among the crude extract and fractions of Polygonatum verticillatum of Nepalese origin, the EA fraction constituted a potent α-glucosidase inhibiting and antioxidant agent. Further research is required to expose the inhibiting compounds.
Keywords: Antioxidant, anti-diabetic, diabetes mellitus, Polygonatum verticillatum, α-glucosidase inhibiton, IC50.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1528-0]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2215083807666210702144103]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00059-4] [PMID: 12020931]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.03.021] [PMID: 16678368]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0RA10453A]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/739834] [PMID: 24723945]
[PMID: 25140204]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq167] [PMID: 20929900]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.12980/jclm.4.2016J5-228]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joim.2018.04.005] [PMID: 29706573]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0748233713483197] [PMID: 23552263]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0748233713506956] [PMID: 24215061]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.4860] [PMID: 23109174]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201800430] [PMID: 30334349]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB09.1448]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-197] [PMID: 23895558]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.4721] [PMID: 22610947]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.687] [PMID: 11268111]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.161270] [PMID: 26288477]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0748233713498454] [PMID: 24081628]