Abstract
Background: Persistent hyperglycemia in diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered the leading cause of morbidity and mortality associated with both microvascular and macrovascular complications, having a greater economic impact. This study aimed to assess the impact of socioeconomic status, prescribing patterns, and patient compliance in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.
Methods: This study was carried out at the Department of Medicine and Diabetic Clinic of Hakeem Abdul Hameed (HAH) Centenary Hospital at Hamdard University, New Delhi, India. We conducted a prospective observational study on prescribing patterns and monitoring adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with type 2 DM (T2DM) under standard care. We enrolled 150 confirmed cases, and data was obtained from pre-validated questionnaires and then coded and analyzed to observe the association between variables.
Results: The glycosylated haemoglobin level in 56% of the cases was between 6.4 to 8.0, and cardiovascular complications were observed as the major comorbidities. 45.33 % of the cases were on mono drug therapy, and metformin (23. 52 %) was the drug of choice, followed by glimepiride (23.52 %). Among the dual drug therapies, sitagliptin with metformin and triple-drug therapy, glimepiride concurrent with metformin and voglibose was the most preferred drug in the treatment of T2DM. Sitagliptin was observed to be a major patient burden (46.213 USD). In only 7.33 % of the cases, we observed definite ADR in T2DM patients. Underprivileged awareness, mainly due to low literacy, was a major concern in the development of new cases of T2DM.
Conclusion: We observed better patient compliance; however, a disease awareness program must be implemented. The use of oral hypoglycaemic drugs is still dominant in clinical practice and cardiovascular disorders as comorbidities emerge as a greater challenge in terms of patient outcome and cost burden.
Keywords: T2DM, socioeconomic study, adverse drug reaction, sitagliptin, cost burden, cardiovascular disorders, prescribing pattern, therapeutic adherence.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1018-9078]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.08.010] [PMID: 26361811]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2014.08.002] [PMID: 25176225]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2015.12.020] [PMID: 26810270]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc07-0150] [PMID: 17670917]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2012.12.005] [PMID: 23523643]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00006] [PMID: 28167928]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9010060] [PMID: 33802774]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2013.02.003] [PMID: 24648818]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157488607779315408] [PMID: 18690951]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2014.07.014] [PMID: 25139631]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000357332] [PMID: 25226797]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/er.2015-1137] [PMID: 27159875]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-392] [PMID: 22646095]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8090560] [PMID: 27649232]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39145-x] [PMID: 30808941]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7987395] [PMID: 28127469]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000214] [PMID: 25580754]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.167553] [PMID: 26693423]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12035] [PMID: 23106132]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.22.2654] [PMID: 18073361]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.12.2933] [PMID: 16306557]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2010.06.002] [PMID: 20598716]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc15-2727] [PMID: 27457632]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-s257]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11892-016-0809-4] [PMID: 27730517]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc16-1728] [PMID: 27926890]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000414] [PMID: 29177050]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12430] [PMID: 27330726]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-12-62] [PMID: 23574917]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014024] [PMID: 21103337]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199604)13:4<365:AID-DIA19>3.0.CO;2-M] [PMID: 9162613]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-131-3-199908030-00004] [PMID: 10428734]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.48.12.2414] [PMID: 10580431]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.9.1455] [PMID: 9727891]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M15-2650] [PMID: 27088241]
[PMID: 23319848]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e736] [PMID: 31038562]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_109_16] [PMID: 28639602]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2016.04.011] [PMID: 27109493]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diaspect.27.3.180] [PMID: 26246777]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S69651] [PMID: 25670885]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.24.2.71]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2222-1808(14)60469-2]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5] [PMID: 30288571]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2017.06.003] [PMID: 28754263]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.3.237] [PMID: 23537458]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db18-1247-P]