Generic placeholder image

Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2212-7976
ISSN (Online): 1874-477X

Research Article

Computational Approach on Acoustic and Flow Performances of a Combined Resistive and Reactive Muffler

Author(s): Farlian Rizky Sinaga, U. Ubaidillah*, Iwan Yahya, Seung-Bok Choi*, Siti Aishah Abdul Aziz and Nurul Azhani Yunus

Volume 15, Issue 3, 2022

Published on: 30 March, 2022

Page: [319 - 327] Pages: 9

DOI: 10.2174/2212797615666220221111307

Price: $65

conference banner
Abstract

Aim: The Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) based vehicles must follow strict regulations regarding noise levels, especially in the racing competition. The noise level is typically gauged as per two different scenarios: stationary engine revolution and maximum achievable revolution. One cannot reach the required noise level by deploying just reactive or resistive muffler type separately. This research recommends a novel mix of reactive and resistive mufflers in a single package solution. For assessing the noise level, three different types of mufflers are devised and studied by means of a computational approach. The new exhaust design in this study becomes a novelty of the proposed article. In analyzing the acoustic capability of the muffler, up to now it has not been able to dampen in various frequency ranges.

Methods: In this paper, the author wants to perform a computational analysis of 3 muffler models that combine several methods of attenuation that are effective at different specific frequency ranges with different configurations in order to obtain a good combined attenuation capability in various frequency ranges. Muffler 1 uses simple reactive and dissipative techniques like standard mufflers, while muffler 2 combines the dissipative technique with a Helmholtz resonator acting as the reactive part. Muffler 3 has a multi-chamber system that uses a combination of several advanced techniques. The three mufflers are evaluated on the basis of their capacity to decrease noise level. This noise level is assessed by considering both transmission and insertion loss through mathematical calculations in the frequency range of 200 Hz to 6400 Hz with the help of pressure acoustic, frequency domain (ACPR) simulation. Apart from noise evaluation, this study also examines flow parameters to estimate the pressure drop for the proposed muffler.

Results: Comsol simulation provided both Insertion Loss (IL) and Transmission Loss (TL) with different trends. Muffler 3 had broadband response compared to its counterparts. Verifiying the finite element simulation results, electroacoustic models of each muffler were simulated using Matlab Simulink to get frequency response. Both finite element and electroacoustic modeling results have a good agreement. Pressure distribution of each model was also evaluated in terms of isosurface total pressure.

Conclusion: It is demonstrated that the proposed muffler having a multi-chamber setup provides the best performances showing both superior and consistent noise reduction throughout the 200-6400 Hz frequency range and good airflow that does not create backpressure due to noise suppression efforts.

Keywords: Vehicle muffler, noise reduction, reactive-dissipative, insertion loss, transmission loss, electro-acoustic, frequencydomain simulation.

[1]
Ahmad MH, Mazlan SA, Ubaidillah KZ, et al. The field-dependent complex modulus of magnetorheological elastomers consisting of su-crose acetate isobutyrate ester. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2017; 28(14): 1993-2004.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1045389X16682844]
[2]
Bujana AK, Yahya I. Ubaidillah. Reactive muffler with additional U-shaped cavities reactive muffler with additional U-shaped cavities. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2019; 2088(1): 020013.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5095265]
[3]
SAE F. Rules FSAE 2019. Formula SAE Rules B Society of automotive engineer competition rules. 2019; pp. 1-134.
[4]
Chen L, Wang X, Du L, Sun X. A three-dimensional analytical approach for large rectangular splitter silencers in the presence of mean flow. J Sound Vib 2021; 513: 116404. Avaialble from: https://www.iso.org/standard/39601.html
[5]
Fioravanti A, Vichi G, Stiaccini I, Ferrara G, Ferrari L. Experimental acoustic analysis of a motorcycle dissipative muffler in presence of mean flow SAE Technical Papers 2016.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2016-32-0039.Copyright]
[6]
Hudha K, Jamaluddin H. Simulation and experimental evaluation on a skyhook policy-based fuzzy logic control for semi-active suspen-sion system. Int J Struct Eng 2011; 2(3): 243-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSTRUCTE.2011.040783]
[7]
Gupta AK. Comparison between square and rectangular cross section muffler to predict noise attenuation with same gas volume. J Sci Technol Res 2016; 2: 194-7. https://www.doi.org/0.1016/j.compgeo.2007.09.001
[8]
Mohammad M, Buang MM, Dahlan AA, Khairuddin MH, Said MF. Simulation of automotive exhaust muffler for tail pipe noise reduction. J Teknol 2017; 79(7-4): 37-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.12263]
[9]
Xue F, Sun B. Experimental study on the comprehensive performance of the application of U-shaped corrugated pipes into reactive muf-flers. Appl Acoust 2018; 141: 362-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.07.021]
[10]
Yu X, Cui FS, Cheng L. On the acoustic analysis and optimization of ducted ventilation systems using a sub-structuring approach. J Acoust Soc Am 2016; 139(1): 279-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4939785] [PMID: 26827024]
[11]
Millo F, Paradisi BP, Arina R, et al. Development of a numerical methodology for the assessment of flow noise in complex engine exhaust systems. SAE Technical Papers 2021.
[12]
Doutres O, Panneton R, Salissou Y. An additional configuration to standard ASTM E2611-09 for measuring the normal incidence sound transmission loss in a modified impedance tube. Proceedings of the Acoustics 2012 Nantes Conference. 2012 April 23-27; Nantes, France. 2029-33.. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00810671/
[13]
Huang S, Fang X, Wang X, Assouar B, Cheng Q, Li Y. Acoustic perfect absorbers via Helmholtz resonators with embedded apertures. J Acoust Soc Am 2019; 145(1): 254-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5087128] [PMID: 30710935]
[14]
Kheybari M, Ebrahimi-Nejad S. Dual-target-frequency-range stop-band acoustic metamaterial muffler: Acoustic and CFD approach. Eng Res Express 2021; 3(3): 035027.
[15]
Selamet E, Selamet A, Iqbal A, Kim H. Acoustics of a Helmholtz resonator aligned parallel with flow: A computational study vs. Experi-ments. Int J Mater Mech Manuf 2013; 1(2): 210-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJMMM.2013.V1.45]
[16]
Gupta AK. Comparison of noise attenuation level by convergent and divergent cylindrical duct with space constraints. Int J Sci Res Sci Eng Technol 2016; 2(2): 778-81.
[17]
Kumar A, Tiwari A. Enhancement on sound transmission loss for various positioning of inlet and outlet duct of the muffler. Int J Eng Manuf 2015; 4: 1-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5815/ijem.2015.04.01]
[18]
Pourtaghi G, Valipour F, Mokarami H, Ataeifarid R. Original article alternations in Helmholtz resonator neck angle and the shape of its connection to the air channels to increase the insertion loss of sound. Sci J Pure Appl Sci 2015; 4(11): 229-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14196/sjpas.v4i11.2015]
[19]
Prasad A, Thiagarajan RC. Acoustic performance design of automotive muffler. In: Conference: COMSOL International Conference; 2015 Oct; Pune, India.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10819.76329]
[20]
Fan Y, Ji Z. Three-pass perforated tube muffler with perforated bulkheads. Adv Mech Eng 2016; 8(11): 168781401667676.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1687814016676767]
[21]
Kim H, Kim J, Lee S, Seo Y. A simple formula for insertion loss prediction of large acoustical enclosures using statistical energy analysis method. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 2014; 6(4): 894-903.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0220]
[22]
Yu X, Cheng L, You X. Hybrid silencers with micro-perforated panels and internal partitions. J Acoust Soc Am 2015; 137(2): 951-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4906148] [PMID: 25698027]
[23]
Xiang L, Zuo S, Wu X, Zhang J, Liu J. Acoustic behaviour analysis and optimal design of a multi-chamber reactive muffler. J Automob Eng 2016; 230(13): 1862-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0954407016630112]
[24]
Williams P, Kirby R, Hill J, Åbom M, Malecki C. Reducing low frequency tonal noise in large ducts using a hybrid reactive-dissipative silencer. Appl Acoust 2018; 131: 61-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.10.018]
[25]
Neihguk D, Fulkar S. Acoustic analysis of a tractor muffler SAE Technical Paper 2017.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1791.Copyright]
[26]
Choi HJ, Mazlan SA, Imaduddin F. Fabrication and viscoelastic characteristics of waste tire rubber based magnetorheological elastomer. Smart Mater Struct 2016; 25(11): 115026.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/11/115026]
[27]
Shinde PV, Desavale RG, Patil VR, Gawali PM, Patil SM. Modeling, attenuation and flow field analysis of diesel engine muffler using fluid structure interaction approach and experimental analysis. SN Appl Sci 2020; 2(5): 920.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy