Generic placeholder image

Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2405-5204
ISSN (Online): 2405-5212

Research Article

New Efficient Configurations for Sour Wastewater Treatment

Author(s): Mamdouh A. Gadalla, Ayat Ghallab, Ahmed M. Mansour, Fatma H. Ashour and Hany A. Elazab*

Volume 15, Issue 1, 2022

Published on: 15 March, 2022

Page: [14 - 30] Pages: 17

DOI: 10.2174/2405520415666211229123400

Price: $65

conference banner
Abstract

Introduction: The environmental legislation on pollutant concentrations in aqueous effluents tends to tighten and increase due to the huge efforts devoted as a response to global warming and its related negative impact on our planet. As a result, sour water must be handled and processed properly to provide a high quality of stripped water with insignificant traces of NH3 and H2S. This approach must be achieved within the minimum operating costs. This scientific research investigates the stripping configurations of sour water effluents from various industries. The research also offers an insight into different scenarios and configurations to accomplish set targets satisfying the environmental law criteria.

Methods: This research introduces a range of heat integration schemes for saving energy. Further, vapor recompression “VRC” technique is opted for its ability to maximize energy savings. This research also investigates the effect of operating and design variables on the stripped water quality, such as feed temperature, feed location, reflux split, and steam flow rate. The option of adding new equipment is also addressed to maximize heat integration and enhance the efficiency of the process. Thus, several schemes and process configurations are explored to treat the industrial sour water waste streams seeking better efficiency. Those configurations differ from one another in heat integration layout and VRC utilization. The energy efficiency and economics of the proposed configurations are considered decisive factors in this research study. The case study adopted in this research is based on published data taken from several iron and steel factories in South Korea named POSCO (Pohang Iron and Steel Corporation).

Results: The obtained results of the treated wastewater streams guarantee that the effluent sour water obeys the standard environmental regulations, i.e., NH3 contents range from 30 to 80 ppm and H2S concentration falls below 0.1 ppm. The obtained results of the seven different scenarios are compared to the original case study. It is found that scenario 7 is the most economical solution saving 51.54 % of the total annual cost compared to the original case study while satisfying the treated water environmental regulations with a concentration of 3.19 ppm NH3 and 0.05 ppm H2S. Scenario 7 creates its own steam, unlike the original case study where steam utility is needed extensively. However, scenario 7 consumes 15 % more electricity than the original case study, but it also still shows 56.34 % less than the overall utility cost.

Conclusion: The optimum process configuration can be employed for other sour water purification systems such as those used in petroleum refiners. An ongoing research work focuses on the use of internal heat integration for more energy savings and economic improvement.

Keywords: Sour water, gas, wastewater treatment, heat integration, energy saving.

[1]
Jen M. Design of sour water stripping system 70th Philippine institute of chemical engineers annual national conven-tion. At Davao City 2009.
[2]
Ralph H. Sour water strippers exposed. Laurence Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, Oklahoma. 2012.
[3]
Asquith J, Moore A. Sour water processing – Balancing needs Brimstone Sulphur Recovery Symposium. Vail, CO. 2000..
[4]
Beychok MR. Aqueous wastes from petroleum and petrochemical plants. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1967.
[5]
Addington L, Fitz C, Lunsford K, Lyddon L, Siwek M. Sour water: Where it comes from and how to handle it. Bryan Research and Engineering 2011; pp. 1-17.
[6]
Armstrong T, Scott B, Taylor K, Gardner A. Sour Water Stripping.In: Today's Refinery. . 1996.
[7]
Lee D, Lee JM, Lee SY, Lee IB. Dynamic simulation of the sour water stripping process and modified structure for ef-fective pressure control. Chem Eng Res Des 2002; 80: 167-77.
[8]
Quinlan MP, Hati AA. Processing NH3 acid gas in a sulfur recovery unit Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference. Norman, OK. . 2010.
[9]
Bossone A. Egypt’s Nile-borne health crisis . Middle East Eye. Available from:. http://www.middleeasteye.net/in-depth/features/egypt-s-nile-borne-health-crisis-2047735604 (Accessed on 16 October, 2015).
[10]
Walker GJ. Design sour water strippers quickly. Hydrocarbon Process 1969; 48(6): 121-4.
[11]
Melin GA, Niedzwiecki JL, Goldstein AM. Optimum design of sour water strippers. Chem Eng Prog 1975; 71(6): 78-82.
[12]
Darton RC, van Grisven PFA, Simmon MM. Development in steam stripping of sour water . Chem Eng 1978; (December): 923-7..
[13]
Isla MA, Irazoqui HA, Cerda J. Improving sour water strippers Hydrocarbon Proc. 1989; 65-6.
[14]
USP tecnologies (2017, 3 March). Re-refinery oil, sour water treated with hydrogen peroxide.. Available from: http://www.h2o2.com/pages.aspx?pid=162& (Accessed on 3 March, 2017).
[15]
Information and decision support center. (2017, 3, March) Maximum limits for gases and emissions.. Available from: http://www.10ramadancity.net/Beaa.htm#top(Accessed on 3 March, 2017).
[16]
Gary J Petroleum refining: Technology and economics. In: Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group 2007.
[17]
Mokhatab S, Poe WA, Mak JY. Handbook of natural gas transmission and processingChapter 11. 4th ed. Gulf Profes-sional Publishing 2019; pp. 361-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815817-3.00011-3]
[18]
Yoon S, Binns M, Park SM, Kim J. Development of energy-efficient processes for natural gas liquids recovery. Energy 2017; 128: 768-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.049]
[19]
Pitman RN, Hudson HM, Wilkinson JD, Cuellar KT. Next generation processes for NGL/LPG recovery. Proceedings of the 77th GPA annual convention . 1998.
[20]
Kidnay AJ, Parrish WR, McCartney DG. Fundamentals of natural gas processing. Boca Raton, New York, USA: CRC Press 2006.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420014044]
[21]
Hung TC, Shai TY, Wang SK. A review of Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) for the recovery of low-grade waste heat. Energy 1997; 22: 661-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(96)00165-X]
[22]
Klemeš JJ, Ed. Handbook of Process Integration (PI): Minimisation of energy and water use, waste and emissions. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited 2013.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9780857097255]
[23]
Lang HJ. Simplified Approach to Preliminary Cost Estimates. Chem Eng, NY 1948.
[24]
Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA. Analysis, synthesis, and design of chemical processes. 3rd ed. Boston, USA: Pearson Education, Inc. 2009.
[25]
Sinnott RK. Chemical engineering design, coulson & Richardson’s chemical engineering series. 4th ed. UK: Elsevier 2005.
[26]
Mosadeghkhah A, Beheshti M. Heat flow diagram as an extension of bridge retrofit method to save energy in heat ex-changer networks. Appl Energy 2020; 26(7): 114971-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114971]
[27]
Munirah A, Klemeš J, Alwi S. Temperature disturbance management in a heat exchanger network for maximum energy recovery considering economic analysis. Energies 2019; 12(594): 1-30.
[28]
Minbo Y, Ting L, Xiao F, Yufei W. A simulation-based targeting method for heat pump placements in heat exchanger networks. Energy 2020; 20(3): 117907-16.
[29]
Muhammad A, Nan Z, Megan J, Lu C. Multi-period design of heat exchanger networks, chemical engineering research and design 2012; 90(5): 1883.. 1895.
[30]
Nair S, Soon M, Karimi I. Locating exchangers in an EIP-wide heat integration network. Comput Chem Eng 2018; 10(8): 57-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.08.004]
[31]
Ning J, Wenqiao H, Fengyuan G, Hangsheng Y, Yingjie X, Ning M. A novel heat exchanger network retrofit approach based on performance reassessment. Energy Convers Manage 2018; 17(7): 477-92.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy