Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Aging Science

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1874-6098
ISSN (Online): 1874-6128

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Quality of Life of Older Adults with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma using Bahasa Malaysia Version of Glaucoma Quality of Life 36 Questionnaire

Author(s): Sangeetha Tharmathurai, Abdul S. Huwaina, Yaakub Azhany , Asrenee A. Razak, Jemaima Che-Hamzah, Qamaruddin Fazilawati and Liza-Sharmini A. Tajudin*

Volume 15, Issue 2, 2022

Published on: 03 September, 2021

Page: [147 - 162] Pages: 16

DOI: 10.2174/1874609814666210903155251

Price: $65

conference banner
Abstract

Background: Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG) is an age-related chronic optic neuropathy causing progressive constriction of visual field, which compromised quality of life (QoL) of older adults.

Objective: The study aims to determine the QoL according to the severity of visual field using Bahasa Malaysia version of the Glaucoma Quality of Life- 36 (Glau-QoL 36) in older adults with POAG in Malaysia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in Malaysia: Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, and Hospital Selayang, Selangor. POAG patients who were ≥ 60 years old at the time of recruitment had minimal cataract, underwent cataract or trabeculectomy surgery at least 3 months prior and were on medical and surgical treatment. The severity of POAG was based on the modified Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) score on two reliable reproducible Humphrey visual field SITA program 24-2 analysis. Face to face, one-on-one interview was conducted using validated Bahasa Malaysia version of GlauQol 36.

Results: A total of 360 older adults with POAG were recruited. Majority were between ages 60-67 (38.3%) with 64 (17.8%) mild, 93 (25.8%) moderate, 115 (31.9%) severe POAG and 88 (24.4%) end-stage severity of POAG. The majority of the recruited patients were not working (88.9%) and live with their families (68.1%). There was a significant association between GlauQoL 36 score of all domains: daily living, driving, physiological well-being, self-image, anxiety, burden of treatment and confidence in healthcare with the severity of POAG (p<0.001). Increased severity of POAG was associated with decreased QoL in all GlauQoL 36 domains except confidence in healthcare. There was also a significant increase in dependency, with a majority of the end-stage were living with their families (p<0.001).

Conclusion: QoL and independency of older adults with POAG decrease with worsening of visual field defect. Addressing the problem of visual-related activities in older adults with POAG may reduce their dependency and improve QoL. Happy living is important to lead to healthy living among older adults with POAG.

Keywords: Quality of life, primary open angle glaucoma, severity, GlauQoL 36, dependency, good health and well-being.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Guidelines E. European glaucoma society terminology and guidelines for glaucoma Br J Ophthalmol 4th ed 2017; 101(5) Part 1.
[2]
Jacob A, Thomas R, Koshi SP, Braganza A, Muliyil J. Preva-lence of primary glaucoma in an urban south Indian popula-tion. Indian J Ophthalmol 1998; 46(2): 81-6.
[PMID: 9847479]
[3]
Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R, et al. Glauco-ma in a rural population of southern India: The Aravind com-prehensive eye survey. Ophthalmology 2003; 110(8): 1484-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00564-5] [PMID: 12917161]
[4]
Leske MC, Nemesure B, He Q, Wu SY, Fielding Hejtmancik J, Hennis A. Patterns of open-angle glaucoma in the Barbados Family Study. Ophthalmology 2001; 108(6): 1015-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00566-8] [PMID: 11382622]
[5]
Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B. Early manifest glaucoma trial: Design and baseline data. Ophthalmology 1999; 106(11): 2144-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90497-9] [PMID: 10571351]
[6]
Hattenhauer MG, Johnson DH, Ing HH, et al. The probability of blindness from open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1998; 105(11): 2099-104.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91133-2] [PMID: 9818612]
[7]
Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, et al. Angle-closure glau-coma in an urban population in southern India. The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology 2000; 107(9): 1710-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00274-8] [PMID: 10964834]
[8]
Khadka J, McAlinden C, Craig JE, Fenwick EK, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. Identifying content for the glaucoma-specific item bank to measure quality-of-life parameters. J Glaucoma 2015; 24(1): 12-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318287ac11] [PMID: 23552836]
[9]
Iester M, Zingirian M. Quality of life in patients with early, moderate and advanced glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 2002; 16(1): 44-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700036] [PMID: 11913887]
[10]
Xavier FMF, Ferraz MPT, Marc N, Escosteguy NU, Moriguchi EH. Elderly people’s definition of quality of life. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2003; 25(1): 31-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462003000100007] [PMID: 12975677]
[11]
Lamoureux EL, Fenwick E, Pesudovs K, Tan D. The impact of cataract surgery on quality of life. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2011; 22(1): 19-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283414284] [PMID: 21088580]
[12]
Finger RP, Fenwick E, Marella M, et al. The impact of vision impairment on vision-specific quality of life in Germany. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52(6): 3613-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-7127] [PMID: 21357395]
[13]
Cardarelli WJ, Smith RA. Managed care implications of age-related ocular conditions. Am J Manag Care 2013; 19.
[14]
Ramulu PY, West SK, Munoz B, Jampel HD, Friedman DS. Glaucoma and reading speed: The salisbury eye evaluation project. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127(1): 82-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.523] [PMID: 19139345]
[15]
Skalicky S, Goldberg I. Depression and quality of life in pa-tients with glaucoma: A cross-sectional analysis using the Geriatric Depression Scale-15, assessment of function related to vision, and the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15. J Glaucoma 2008; 17(7): 546-51. Available from: https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00061198-200810000-00007
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318163bdd1] [PMID: 18854731]
[16]
Siok WT, Perfetti CA, Jin Z, Tan LH. A visuospatial deficit co-exists with a phonological deficit in Chinese dyslexia. NeuroImage Suppl,1 2009; Vol. 47: S47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70082-5]
[17]
Bournias TE, Abraham C. Pressure-lowering efficacy of bi-matoprost and latanoprost: Effect of baseline mean diurnal IOP. Iovs 2004; p. 45.
[18]
Varma R, Richman EA, Ferris FL III, Bressler NM. Use of patient-reported outcomes in medical product development: A report from the 2009 NEI/FDA Clinical Trial Endpoints Sym-posium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51(12): 6095-103.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5627] [PMID: 21123768]
[19]
Béchetoille A, Arnould B, Bron A, et al. Measurement of health-related quality of life with glaucoma: validation of the Glau-QoL 36-item questionnaire. Acta Ophthalmol 2008; 86(1): 71-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00999.x] [PMID: 17725614]
[20]
Rouland JF, Denis P. , BA(c)chetoille A, et al. Creating a spe-cific quality-of-life questionnaire in patients with glaucoma: Item generation. J Fr Ophtalmol 2002; 25(8): 785-94.
[PMID: 12471344]
[21]
Chandramohan H, Halim WHWA, Azizi HA, et al. Quality of life and severity of glaucoma: A study using Glaucol-36 ques-tionnaire at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC). Int Med J 2017; 24(1)
[22]
Riva I, Legramandi L, Rulli E, et al. Vision-related quality of life and symptom perception change over time in newly-diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients. Sci Rep 2019; 9(1): 6735.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43203-9] [PMID: 31043703]
[23]
Advanced glaucoma intervention study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology 1994; 101(8): 1445-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31171-7] [PMID: 7741836]
[24]
Brown GC. Living too long: The current focus of medical research on increasing the quantity, rather than the quality, of life is damaging our health and harming the economy. EMBO Rep 2015; 16(2): 137-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201439518] [PMID: 25525070]
[25]
Lamoureux EL, Chong E, Wang JJ, et al. Visual impairment, causes of vision loss, and falls: The singapore malay eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49(2): 528-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-1036] [PMID: 18234995]
[26]
Mills T, Law SK, Walt J, Buchholz P, Hansen J. Quality of life in glaucoma and three other chronic diseases: A systematic literature review. Drugs Aging 2009; 26(11): 933-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/11316830-000000000-00000] [PMID: 19848439]
[27]
Maharajah KR, Tet CM, Yaacob A, Tajudin LSA, Foster PJ. Modified Bahasa Malaysia version of VF-14 questionnaire: Assessing the impact of glaucoma in rural area of Malaysia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 36(3): 222-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01719.x] [PMID: 18412590]
[28]
Angeles TL, Eye L. Impact of visual field loss on health 2007; 941-.
[29]
McKean-Cowdin R, Wang Y, Wu J, Azen SP, Varma R. Im-pact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: The Los Angeles latino eye study. Ophthalmology 2008; 115(6): 941-948.e1.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.037] [PMID: 17997485]
[30]
Freeman EE. MuAnoz B, Turano KA, West SK. Measures of visual function and their association with driving modification in older adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47(2): 514-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0934] [PMID: 16431944]
[31]
Mangione CM, Berry S, Spritzer K, et al. Identifying the con-tent area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Func-tion Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116(2): 227-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archopht.116.2.227] [PMID: 9488276]
[32]
Burr JM, Kilonzo M, Vale L, Ryan M. Developing a prefer-ence-based Glaucoma Utility Index using a discrete choice experiment. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84(8): 797-808.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181339f30] [PMID: 17700343]
[33]
Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, et al. Aging with multi-morbidity: A systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev 2011; 10(4): 430-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003] [PMID: 21402176]
[34]
Chen J, Lin ZN, Tao YT, et al. Influences of personality char-acteristics and coping modes on anxiety in primary glaucoma patients. Int J Ophthalmol 2019; 12(7): 1163-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2019.07.18] [PMID: 31341809]
[35]
Otori Y, Takahashi G, Urashima M, Kuwayama Y. Evaluating the quality of life of glaucoma patients using the state-trait anxiety inventory. J Glaucoma 2017; 26(11): 1025-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000761] [PMID: 28858160]
[36]
Janz NK, Wren PA, Guire KE, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Lichter PR. Fear of blindness in the collaborative initial glau-coma treatment study: patterns and correlates over time. Ophthalmology 2007; 114(12): 2213-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.02.014] [PMID: 17490746]
[37]
Attebo K, Mitchell P, Smith W. Visual acuity and the causes of visual loss in Australia. The blue mountains eye study. Ophthalmology 1996; 103(3): 357-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30684-2] [PMID: 8600410]
[38]
Wang Y, Alnwisi S, Ke M. The impact of mild, moderate, and severe visual field loss in glaucoma on patients quality of life measured via the glaucoma quality of life-15 questionnaire Med (United States) 2017; 96(48): 0-7.
[39]
Beebe TJ, Rey E, Ziegenfuss JY, et al. Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: impact on re-sponse rate and quality. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-50] [PMID: 20529365]
[40]
Rolstad S, Adler J. RydA(c)n A. Response burden and ques-tionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value Health 2011; 14(8): 1101-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003] [PMID: 22152180]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
21
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy