Abstract
Objective: The study aims to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile of Praeruptorin A and khellactone and in vitro hydrolysis of praeruptorin A to khellactone in different biological samples.
Methods: A LC-MS/MS method was established. Analytes and internal standard (IS) were isolated using the protein precipitation method and then separated on a Thermo BDS Hypersil C18 (2.1 mm×50 mm, 2.4μm) column using a mobile phase consisting of 0.05% formic acid solution and acetonitrile. Samples were analyzed in positive electrospray-ionization (ESI) mode using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM).
Results: The calibration plots gave desirable linearity (r2>0.99) in the concentration range from 0.99-990.0 and 2.0-2000.0 ng/mL for Praeruptorin A and khellactone, respectively. In addition, the LOQs of these analytes were sufficient for vivo pharmacokinetic study and vitro hydrolysis study of Praeruptorin A. The intra-batch and inter-batch precision were all within 14.05%, and the accuracy was between 89.39% and 109.50%. The extraction efficiency of PA and khellactone ranged from 76.35 ~ 89.58%. The matrix effects of analytes and the IS were between 89.67% ~ 105.26%.
Conclusion: The liver CYPs mediated by the metabolism of PA may contribute to the systemic exposure of its active metabolite, khellactone, in rats.
Keywords: Praeruptorin A, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, pharmacokinetics, hydrolysis metabolism, khellactone, P450.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00004] [PMID: 28144249]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01946-0] [PMID: 12877932]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010010] [PMID: 29267213]
[PMID: 14704120]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.12.015] [PMID: 27965051]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.11.053] [PMID: 25480680]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.01.001] [PMID: 26773893]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1350955] [PMID: 24214834]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.02.037] [PMID: 22401763]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10753-011-9400-y] [PMID: 22083490]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2010.04.024] [PMID: 20433815]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmc.3977] [PMID: 28321891]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00498254.2010.526653] [PMID: 20979451]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.10.010] [PMID: 24342524]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12272-011-0811-y] [PMID: 21910053]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmu077] [PMID: 25015377]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2010.09.009] [PMID: 21036581]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.08.042] [PMID: 24095802]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2006.06.066] [PMID: 16875827]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-827146] [PMID: 15241888]
[PMID: 22615659]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.06.020] [PMID: 28654868]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.03.004] [PMID: 22449378]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.08.021] [PMID: 24041522]