Generic placeholder image

Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2772-4328
ISSN (Online): 2772-4336

Opinion Article

Progress in Analgesic Development: How to Assess its Real Merits?

Author(s): Igor Kissin*

Volume 17, Issue 2, 2022

Published on: 29 November, 2021

Page: [90 - 93] Pages: 4

DOI: 10.2174/2772432816666210811145249

open access plus

conference banner
Abstract

Background: Assessing analgesic drugs developed over preceding 50 years demonstrated that very intensive efforts directed at diverse molecular pain targets produced thousands of PubMed articles and the introduction of more than 50 new analgesics. Nevertheless, these analgesics did not have a sufficiently broad spectrum of action and level of effectiveness to demonstrably affect the use of opioids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain. Analgesics in current are only modestly effective in chronic pain (at least with respect to neuropathic pain), and the widespread application of mu-opioid receptor agonists for this purpose culminated in the global “opioid crisis”. The introduction of every new drug is regarded as an important success, at least initially. Assessing the merit of a new analgesic is extremely complicated.

Objective: The aim of this article is to describe an approach that combines very different categories of drug evaluation – multifactorial approach for the assessment of new analgesics. It is based on conclusiveness of clinical trials, novelty of a drug’s molecular target, a drug’s commercial appeal, and the interest in a drug reflected by scientometric indices.

Results: This approach was applied to analgesics developed in 1982-2016. It shows that although several new agents have completely novel mechanisms of action, all newly approved drugs, and drug candidates, demonstrated the same persistent problems: relatively low therapeutic advantage over previous treatment and narrow spectrum of use in different types of pain, compared to opioids or NSAIDs.

Conclusion: The use of the suggested multifactorial approach to drug assessment may provide a better view of the whole spectrum of analgesics advantages and disadvantages.

Keywords: Acute pain, chronic pain, migraine, molecular targets, pain syndromes, scientometrics.

« Previous
[1]
Kissin I. The development of new analgesics over the past 50 years: A lack of real breakthrough drugs. Anesth Analg 2010; 110(3): 780-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cde882] [PMID: 20185657]
[2]
Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14(2): 162-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70251-0] [PMID: 25575710]
[3]
Han B, Compton WM, Blanco C, Crane E, Lee J, Jones CM. Prescription opioid use, misuse, and use disorders in U.S. adults: 2015 national survey on drug use and health. Ann Intern Med 2017; 167(5): 293-301.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M17-0865] [PMID: 28761945]
[4]
Ballantyne JC. Opioids for treatment of chronic pain: Mistakes made, lessons learned, and future directions. Anesth Analg 2017; 125(5): 1769-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002500] [PMID: 29049121]
[5]
Kissin I. Scientometric assessment of drugs for chronic pain, 1979-2013: Rapid growth of publications, paucity of successful drugs. J Pain Res 2014; 7: 505-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S67479] [PMID: 25187736]
[6]
Correll DJ, Kissin I. Problems with developments of breakthrough analgesics: Recent history via scientometric analysis. J Anesth Hist 2019; 5(2): 49-57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.janh.2019.03.001] [PMID: 31400836]
[7]
Kissin I. What can big data on academic interest reveal about a drug? Reflections in three major U.S. databases. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2018; 39(3): 248-57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2017.12.005] [PMID: 29358009]
[8]
Hill RG. Analgesic drugs in development. Wall and Melzack’s Textbook of Pain. 5th. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2006.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-443-07287-6/50040-0]
[9]
Drey A. Pharmacological modulation of pain. Science of pain. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier 2009.
[10]
Hayes AG, Arendt-Nielsen L, Tate S. Multiple mechanisms have been tested in pain-How can we improve the chances of success? Curr Opin Pharmacol 2014; 14(2): 11-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2013.09.017] [PMID: 24565006]
[11]
Heinzmann S, McMahon SB. New molecules for the treatment of pain. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2011; 5(2): 111-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0b013e328345bb7e] [PMID: 21455071]
[12]
De Logu F, Geppetti P. Ion channel pharmacology for pain modulation. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2019; 260: 161-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/164_2019_336] [PMID: 31820179]

© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy