Abstract
Background: Longitudinal changes of brain metabolites during a functional stimulation are unknown in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) subjects.
Objective: This study was to evaluate the longitudinal changes of brain metabolites using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) in response to treatment during a memory task in the subjects of cognitive normal (CN), aMCI, and AD.
Methods: We acquired functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS) data from 28 CN elderly, 16 aMCI and 12 AD subjects during a face-name association task. We measured fMRS metabolite ratios over 24 months in the 8-month apart, determined the temporal changes of the metabolites, and evaluated the differences among the three groups under the three different conditions (base, novel, repeat).
Results: The results of comparisons for the three subject groups and the three-time points showed that tNAA/tCho and tCr/tCho were statistically significant among the three subject groups in any of the three conditions. The dynamic temporal change measurements for the metabolites for each condition showed that Glx/tCho and Glu/tCho levels at the third visit increased significantly compared with in the first visit in the novel condition in the AD group.
Conclusion: We found declines in tNAA/tCho and tCr/tCho in the aMCI and AD subjects with increasing disease severity, being highest in CN and lowest in AD. The Glx/tCho level increased temporally in the AD subjects after they took an acetylcholine esterase inhibitor. Therefore, Glx may be suitable to demonstrate functional recovery after treatment.
Keywords: Longitudinal study, functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, glutamine and glutamate complex (Glx), total N-acetylaspartate (tNAA).
[PMID: 23696705]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cmr.a.20072]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199902)41:2<276::AID-MRM10>3.0.CO;2-8] [PMID: 10080274]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb02850.x] [PMID: 3965552]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.07.005] [PMID: 17719145]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033583502003803] [PMID: 12599751]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.16.4.538] [PMID: 12382992]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.003] [PMID: 19640477]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-150877] [PMID: 27060946]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.58.12.1985] [PMID: 11735772]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.56.3.303] [PMID: 10190820]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.38.3.359] [PMID: 3347338]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.698] [PMID: 11410943]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.016] [PMID: 20728076]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22841] [PMID: 26059006]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.042] [PMID: 25462698]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.10.007] [PMID: 19833161]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/7854_2011_197] [PMID: 22294088]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.11.2003] [PMID: 14594748]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000228218.68451.31] [PMID: 16894124]