Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

当代阿耳茨海默病研究

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1567-2050
ISSN (Online): 1875-5828

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe Translate in English
Research Article

阿尔茨海默氏症团队的社交网络分析：临床回顾和在精神病学中的应用，以探索跨专业护理

卷 18, 期 5, 2021

发表于: 20 July, 2021

页: [380 - 398] 页: 19

弟呕挨: 10.2174/1567205018666210701161449

open access plus

摘要

简介：了解精神病医院和与阿尔茨海默氏症 (PWA) 患者合作的社区专业人员的社交网络有助于解决患者护理中的知识管理问题，以及团队成员在向同事提供信息和建议方面的中心地位。 目标：使用社交网络分析 (SNA) 来确认或拒绝精神科专业人员在共享有关 PWA 护理的信息和建议方面具有平等地位并在社交网络中具有互惠关系的假设。 方法：样本由 50 名在英国老年精神病学工作的精神病学专业人士组成，完成了一项匿名在线调查，要求他们选择跨专业团队中在提供或接受有关患者护理和收集建议时最常接触的同事的专业类别患者信息。 SNA 既是一种描述性的定性分析，也是一种定量方法，它调查专业人员在其工作网络中的声望程度、他们与其他团队成员的关系的互惠程度以及知识管理。 结果：社交网络图表和数值结果表明，老年精神病学的跨专业团队有医疗保健人员，他们在为整个团队提供患者护理所需的知识方面发挥着核心作用；他们主要是从事护理和医疗工作的高级专业人员。然而，该研究报告称，只有 13% 的专业人士与团队内的知识共享建立了互惠关系。 结论：目前的研究结果表明，负责 PWA 的跨专业团队的知识管理分布不均。那些资历和经验明显更高的人更常被咨询；然而，其他更外围的数字在综合护理中也同样有价值。

关键词: 阿尔茨海默病、社交网络分析、跨专业、精神病学、知识管理、护理。

« Previous Next »
[1]
Barr H, Koppel I, Reeves S, Hammick M, Freeth D. Effective interprofessional education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing 2005.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470776445]
[2]
Alzheimer Society Fix dementia care and hospitals the statistics 2018.Available from: https://www.alzheimers.org
[3]
Department of Health. Dementia: a state of the nation report on dementia care and support in England Assets 2013. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/262139/Dementia.pdf
[4]
David CPM. Prime Minister Challenge on Dementia 2020. Cabinet Office Department of Health & Social Care, Prime Minister Office 10 Downing Street 2019.Available from: www.gov.uk/government/ publications/prime-minsiters-challenge-on-dementia-2020/prime-ministers-challence-on-dementia-2020
[5]
Royal College of Physicians Improving teams in healthcare: Resource 1-Building Effective Teams RCP London 2017.Available from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/improving-teams-healthcare
[6]
Royal College of Physicians Improving teams in healthcare: Resource 3-Team communication [Internet] RCP London 2017.Available from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/improving-teams-healthcare
[7]
Royal College of Physicians. Improving teams in healthcare: Resource 2-Team culture [Internet] RCP London 2017.Available from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/improving-teams-healthcare
[8]
Bilodeau K, Dubois S, Pepin J. Interprofessional patient-centred practice in oncology teams: utopia or reality? J Interprof Care 2015; 29(2): 106-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.942838] [PMID: 25070427]
[9]
Thomson K, Outram S, Gilligan C, Levett-Jones T. Interprofessional experiences of recent healthcare graduates: A social psychology perspective on the barriers to effective communication, teamwork, and patient-centred care. J Interprof Care 2015; 29(6): 634-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1040873] [PMID: 26230377]
[10]
Burau V, Carstensen K, Lou S, Kuhlmann E. Professional groups driving change toward patient-centred care: interprofessional working in stroke rehabilitation in Denmark. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17(1): 662.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2603-7] [PMID: 28915837]
[11]
Goodwin S, MacNaughton-Doucet L, Allan J. Call to action: Interprofessional mental health collaborative practice in rural and northern Canada. Can Psychol 2016; 57(3): 181-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cap0000057]
[12]
Molin J, Graneheim UH, Ringnér A, Lindgren BM. From ideals to resignation - interprofessional teams perspectives on everyday life processes in psychiatric inpatient care. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2016; 23(9-10): 595-604.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12349] [PMID: 27785861]
[13]
Vaughn VM, Saint S, Krein SL, et al. Characteristics of healthcare organisations struggling to improve quality: results from a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Qual Saf 2019; 28(1): 74-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007573] [PMID: 30045864]
[14]
Li J, Talari P, Kelly A, et al. Interprofessional Teamwork Innovation Model (ITIM) to promote communication and patient-centred, coordinated care. BMJ Qual Saf 2018; 27(9): 700-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007369] [PMID: 29444853]
[15]
Sacks GD, Shannon EM, Dawes AJ, et al. Teamwork, communication and safety climate: a systematic review of interventions to improve surgical culture. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; 24(7): 458-67.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003764] [PMID: 26002946]
[16]
Lazzari C. Partnership in healthcare teams provides patient-centred care in dementia. Cientperiodique Medicine 2018; 1(6): 1-4.
[17]
Dupuis S, McAiney CA, Fortune D, Ploeg J, Witt Ld. Theoretical foundations guiding culture change: The work of the Partnerships in Dementia Care Alliance. Dementia 2016; 15(1): 85-105.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1471301213518935] [PMID: 24419355]
[18]
World Health Organization Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in Primary Health Care: Nursing and Midwifery Perspectives [Internet] Whoint 2020.Available from: http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/ IPE_SixCaseStudies.pdf?ua=1
[19]
Rosen MA, DiazGranados D, Dietz AS, et al. Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. Am Psychol 2018; 73(4): 433-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000298] [PMID: 29792459]
[20]
Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2012; 21(3): 239-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000187] [PMID: 22129933]
[21]
Pomare C, Long JC, Ellis LA, Churruca K, Braithwaite J. Interprofessional collaboration in mental health settings: a social network analysis. J Interprof Care 2019; 33(5): 497-503.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1544550] [PMID: 30411988]
[22]
Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478]
[23]
Crossley N, Bellotti E, Edwards G, Everette M, Koskinen J, Tranmer M. Social Network Analysis for Ego-Nets. Los Angeles, Calif.: SAGE 2015.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473911871]
[24]
Lockhart N. Social Network analysis as an analytic tool for task group research: A case study of an interdisciplinary community of practice. J Spec Group Work 2017; 42(2): 152-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2017.1301610]
[25]
Yang S, Keller B, Zheng L. Social network analysis: Methods and examples. London: SAGE 2017.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781071802847]
[26]
Scott J. Social Network Analysis. 2nd. London etc. Sage 2000.
[27]
Knoke D, Yang S. Social Network Analysis. 2nd ed. London: SAGE 2008.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412985864]
[28]
Prell C. Social Network Analysis. Los Angeles: SAGE 2012.
[29]
Social Network Visualizer Free and Open-Source Tool for Social Network Analysis, Social Network Visualizer, [Intenet] 2019. Available from https://socnetv.org/
[30]
De Brún A, McAuliffe E. Social network analysis as a methodological approach to explore health systems: A case study exploring support among senior managers/executives in a hospital network. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15(3): 511-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030511] [PMID: 29534038]
[31]
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annu Rev Sociol 2001; 27(1): 415-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415]
[32]
Xie WJ, Li MX, Jiang ZQ, et al. Skill complementarity enhances heterophily in collaboration networks. Sci Rep 2016; 6(1): 18727.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep18727] [PMID: 26743687]
[33]
Franks D, Noble J, Kaufmann P, Stagl S. Extremism propagation in social networks with Hubs. Adapt Behav 2008; 16(4): 264-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059712308090536]
[34]
Yousefi Nooraie R, Lohfeld L, Marin A, Hanneman R, Dobbins M. Informing the implementation of evidence-informed decision making interventions using a social network analysis perspective; a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17(1): 122.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2067-9] [PMID: 28178958]
[35]
Gamble J, Chintakunta H, Wilkerson A, Krim H. Node Dominance: Revealing Community and Core-Periphery Structure in Social Networks.IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks 2016; 2(2): 186-99.
[36]
Bright CF, Cozart T, Bagley B, Scott H, Dennis J. Social network gap analysis evaluation: A case study of the southeastern health equity council. Fam Community Health 2019; 42(1): 44-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000210] [PMID: 30431468]
[37]
Qiao J, Huang H, Li G, Fan Y. Bridging the gap between different social networks. Physica A 2014; 410: 535-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.05.067]
[38]
Cross R, Parker A. The Hidden Power of Social Networks. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press 2004.
[39]
Scott J. Social Network Analysis. 4th ed. London: SAGE 2017.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529716597]
[40]
Tsvetovat M, Kouznetosov A. Social network analysis for startups. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly 2011.
[41]
Hannemann R, Riddle M. Introduction to Social Network Methods: Chapter 1 Introduction, Riverside: University of California [Internet] 2005.Available from: http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/Introduction_to_Social_Network_Methods.pdf
[42]
Bae SH, Nikolaev A, Seo JY, Castner J. Health care provider social network analysis: A systematic review. Nurs Outlook 2015; 63(5): 566-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2015.05.006] [PMID: 26162750]
[43]
McCurdie T, Sanderson P, Aitken LM. Applying social network analysis to the examination of interruptions in healthcare. Appl Ergon 2018; 67: 50-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.08.014] [PMID: 29122200]
[44]
Sabot K, Wickremasinghe D, Blanchet K, Avan B, Schellenberg J. Use of social network analysis methods to study professional advice and performance among healthcare providers: a systematic review. Syst Rev 2017; 6(1): 208.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0597-1] [PMID: 29058638]
[45]
Currarini S, Matheson J, Vega-Redondo F. A simple model of homophily in social networks. Eur Econ Rev 2016; 90: 18-39.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.011]
[46]
Barnett G, Xu W, Chu J, et al. Measuring international relations in social media conversations. Gov Inf Q 2017; 34(1): 37-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.12.004]
[47]
Kawonga M, Blaauw D, Fonn S. Exploring the use of social network analysis to measure communication between disease programme and district managers at sub-national level in South Africa. Soc Sci Med 2015; 135: 1-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.024] [PMID: 25931377]
[48]
Katz N, Lazer D, Arrow H, Contractor N. Network theory and small groups. Small Group Res 2004; 35(3): 307-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496404264941]
[49]
Eckl M, Ghanem C, Löwenstein H. The evolution of social work from disconnected groups to a scientific community: A social network analysis. Br J Soc Work 2018; 49(2): 428-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy050]
[50]
Yan F, Cai S, Zhang M, Liu G, Deng Z. A clique-superposition model for social networks. Sci China Inf Sci 2012; 56(5): 1-19.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4526-y]
[51]
Mascia D, Cicchetti A, Fantini MP, Damiani G, Ricciardi W. Physicians’ propensity to collaborate and their attitude towards EBM: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11(1): 172.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-172] [PMID: 21787395]
[52]
Mascia D, Cicchetti A. Physician social capital and the reported adoption of evidence-based medicine: exploring the role of structural holes. Soc Sci Med 2011; 72(5): 798-805.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.011] [PMID: 21306807]
[53]
Mascia D, Dandi R, Di Vincenzo F. Professional networks and EBM use: a study of inter-physician interaction across levels of care. Health Policy 2014; 118(1): 24-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.06.003] [PMID: 25022323]
[54]
Gillieatt S, Fernandes C, Fielding A, Hendrick A, Martin R, Matthews S. Social network analysis and social work inquiry. Aust Soc Work 2015; 68(3): 338-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2015.1035660]
[55]
Burchard J, Cornwell B. Structural holes and bridging in two-mode networks. Soc Networks 2018; 55: 11-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.04.001]
[56]
Fitzhugh S, Butts C. Patterns of co-membership: Techniques for identifying subgraph composition. Soc Networks 2018; 55: 1-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.03.006]
[57]
Nicaise P, Tulloch S, Dubois V, Matanov A, Priebe S, Lorant V. Using social network analysis for assessing mental health and social services inter-organisational collaboration: findings in deprived areas in Brussels and London. Adm Policy Ment Health 2013; 40(4): 331-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10488-012-0423-y] [PMID: 22543978]
[58]
Wyngaerden F, Nicaise P, Dubois V, Lorant V. Social support network and continuity of care: an ego-network study of psychiatric service users. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2019; 54(6): 725-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01660-7] [PMID: 30758541]
[59]
Can F, Özier T, Polat F. State of the art applications of social network analysis. London: Springer International PU 2016.
[60]
Giuffre K. Community and networks: Using social network analysis to rethink urban and community studies. Cambridge: Polity Press 2013.
[61]
Dreier-Wolfgramm A, Michalowsky B, Austrom MG, et al. Dementia care management in primary care: Current collaborative care models and the case for interprofessional education. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2017; 50(Suppl. 2): 68-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-017-1220-8] [PMID: 28364258]
[62]
Stephan A, Möhler R, Renom-Guiteras A, Meyer G. Successful collaboration in dementia care from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and informal carers in Germany: results from a focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 208.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0875-3] [PMID: 26017697]
[63]
Lazzari C, Kotera Y, Thomas H. Social network analysis of dementia wards in psychiatric hospitals to explore the advancement of personhood in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2019; 16(6): 505-17.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567205016666190612160955] [PMID: 31195945]
[64]
Cartwright J, Franklin D, Forman D, Freegard H. Promoting collaborative dementia care via online interprofessional education. Australas J Ageing 2015; 34(2): 88-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12106] [PMID: 24118831]
[65]
Barnsteiner JH, Disch JM, Hall L, Mayer D, Moore SM. Promoting interprofessional education. Nurs Outlook 2007; 55(3): 144-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2007.03.003] [PMID: 17524802]
[66]
Lazzari C. Ecological momentary assessments and interventions in Alzheimer’s caregiving. Curr Alzheimer Res 2018; 15(11): 1027-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567205015666180702111523] [PMID: 29962343]
[67]
Kitwood T. Dementia reconsidered. Maidenhead: Open University Press 2011.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t895q0.15]
[68]
Open Meta-Analyst OpenMeta[Analyst] - CEBM @ Brown 2019.Available from: http://www.cebm.brown.edu/openmeta/Accessed 09 April 2019.
[69]
Wallace B, Dahabreh I, Trikalinos T, Lau J, Trow P, Schmid C. Closing the gap between methodologists and end-users: R as a computational back-end. J Stat Softw 2012; 49(5): 1-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v049.i05]
[70]
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327(7414): 557-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557] [PMID: 12958120]
[71]
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21(11): 1539-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186] [PMID: 12111919]
[72]
Shoham DA, Harris JK, Mundt M, McGaghie W. A network model of communication in an interprofessional team of healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional study of a burn unit. J Interprof Care 2016; 30(5): 661-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1203296] [PMID: 27436781]
[73]
Palazzolo M, Grippa F, Booth A, Rechner S, Bucuvalas J, Gloor P. Measuring social network structure of clinical teams caring for patients with complex conditions. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2011; 26: 17-29.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.558]
[74]
Asikainen A, Iñiguez G, Kaski K, Kivelä M. Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks arXiv 2018; : 1-14.[physics.soc-ph]
[75]
Mascia D, Cicchetti A, Damiani G. “Us and them”: A social network analysis of physicians’ professional networks and their attitudes towards EBM. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13(1): 429.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-429] [PMID: 24148207 ]
[76]
Kunz N, Kastelle T, Moran C. Social network analysis reveals that communication gaps may prevent effective water management in the mining sector. J Clean Prod 2017; 148: 915-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.175]
[77]
Groenen CJ, van Duijnhoven NT, Faber MJ, Koetsenruijter J, Kremer JA, Vandenbussche FP. Use of social network analysis in maternity care to identify the profession most suited for case manager role. Midwifery 2017; 45: 50-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.12.007] [PMID: 28024229]
[78]
Royal College of Psychiatrists Person-centred care: implications for training in psychiatry: College report CR215 London, Royal College of Psychiatrists 2018.Available from: rcpsych.ac.uk
[79]
Chauhan B, Jeyaraman M, Mann A, Lys J, Skidmore B, Sibley K, et al. Behavior change interventions and policies influencing primary healthcare professionals’ practice—an overview of reviews. Implement Sci 2017; 12(3): 1-16.
[80]
Bachynsky N. Implications for policy: The Triple Aim, Quadruple Aim, and interprofessional collaboration. Nurs Forum 2020; 55(1): 54-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12382] [PMID: 31432533]
[81]
Ellis P. Evidence-based practice in nursing. 2nd ed. London: SAGE 2013.
[82]
Lazzari C, Rabottini M. The Assessment of Interprofessional Learning and Practice in Psychiatry: A guide for healthcare practitioners. Amazon Kindle Edition 2021.
[83]
Farinde A. The interprofessional management of dementia-related behavioral and psychological disturbances. Health Interprofessional Prac 2014; 2(2): 1-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7772/2159-1253.1064]
[84]
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Dementia: assessment, management and support for people living with dementia and their carers 2018.Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ ng97 accessed: January 6, 2019.
[85]
Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (3): CD000072
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2] [PMID: 19588316]
[86]
Lazzari C, McAleer S, Nusair A, Rabottini M. Psychiatric training during covid-19 pandemic benefits from integrated practice in interprofessional teams and ecological momentary e-assessment. Riv Psichiatr 2021; 56(2): 74-84.
[PMID: 33899828]
[87]
Clauson Kevin A, Aungst Timothy D. Simard Roger, Fox Brent I, Elizabeth A, Breeden Lessons Learned and Looking Forward with Pharmacy Education: Informatics and Digital HealthHealth Professionals’ Education in the Age of Clinical Information Systems, Mobile Computing and Social Networks. Academic Press 2017; pp. 181-99.
[88]
Verhaegh KJ, Seller-Boersma A, Simons R, et al. An exploratory study of healthcare professionals’ perceptions of interprofessional communication and collaboration. J Interprof Care 2017; 31(3): 397-400.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1289158] [PMID: 28266883]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
24
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy