Abstract
Background: Topoisomerase I (Topo I) is a key target of many antitumor drugs in vivo. Alkaloids in Sophora alopecuroides L. can reportedly inhibit Topo I activity, but the pharmacodynamic material basis has not yet been determined.
Objective: This study aimed to rapidly identify active components which inhibit Topo I in S. alopecuroides L.
Methods: Affinity ultrafiltration coupled with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time of flight-mass spectrometry (UF-UPLC-QTOF-MS) screening system based on Topo I protein was established to screen and isolate a total alkaloid fraction in S. alopecuroides L. Topo I inhibitory activity and anti-tumor proliferation activity of the screened components were evaluated, and their molecular mechanisms were studied.
Results: Six compounds that bound specifically to Topo I were obtained. Further screening showed that matrine, cytisine, and sophoridine presented higher inhibitory activity on Topo I and were able to inhibit the proliferation of breast cancer MDA-MB-468 cells with IC50 values of 9.40 ± 1.12 mM, 17.4 ± 2.20 mM, and 10.4 ± 1.37 mM, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, their dual molecular mechanisms against Topo I have not discussed to date. In this study, the following dual mechanisms are reviewed for the first time: (1) stabilization of the Topo I-DNA complex and (2) inhibition or blocking of Topo I binding to DNA.
Conclusion: Matrine, cytisine, and sophoridine from S. alopecuroides L. were defined as the active components possessing Topo I inhibitory activity, and their pharmacological mechanism was confirmed, which provided an important base for further research and development of antitumor components from S. alopecuroides L.
Keywords: Sophora alopecuroides L., topoisomerase I inhibitory avtivity, UF-UPLC-QTOF-MS, active components group, molecular mechanisms, effective substances.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389450120666190618125816] [PMID: 31215388]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2020.10.009]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.02.022] [PMID: 25813880]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.01.005] [PMID: 21277330]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.104781] [PMID: 33677246]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11418-015-0928-2] [PMID: 26142710]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2011.03.052] [PMID: 21459139]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.112775] [PMID: 32205259]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111972] [PMID: 31884408]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2013.04.016] [PMID: 23647610]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2014.11.022] [PMID: 25481087]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00228] [PMID: 28496409]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm831] [PMID: 12042765]
[PMID: 11441236]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0016] [PMID: 19584232]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1054-3589(08)61132-1] [PMID: 8996602]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01521] [PMID: 28919906]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00594-2]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi1009419] [PMID: 21033700]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2015.01.049] [PMID: 25681808]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2011.10.015] [PMID: 22078843]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2012.04.024] [PMID: 22613581]
[PMID: 3450141]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01938] [PMID: 30897325]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6MD00563B] [PMID: 30108747]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.200890121] [PMID: 18649321]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2018.03.015] [PMID: 29567333]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4414] [PMID: 29845233]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1407764] [PMID: 25517706]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024491219366] [PMID: 12889599]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9084(98)80008-4] [PMID: 9615865]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm049213f] [PMID: 15743184]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.369] [PMID: 11395412]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-418-0_15] [PMID: 19997888]