Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Environmental Management (Discontinued)

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2666-2140
ISSN (Online): 2666-2159

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Case Studies

Effects of Fine Grid NO2 Modeling around a Thermal Power Station: A Case Study

Author(s): Md Masud Karim*, Navin Bindra and Mohammed Mukteruzzaman

Volume 7, Issue 1, 2020

Page: [67 - 79] Pages: 13

DOI: 10.2174/2666214007999200826110202

Price: $65

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of fine grid modeling on top of a courser grid to predict the NO2 concentration more accurately in an airshed and at sensitive receptors.

Methods: This study assessed the cumulative NO2 impact of all major emission sources in an airshed using USEPA regulatory model AERMOD. A 50 km by 50 km airshed is considered in the study. Micro-environmental pollution was modeled using a refined grid analysis. An area (4 km x 4 km) close to GTPS, with receptors at every 150 m apart and a further fine grid (500 m x 500 m) with receptors at every 50 m apart, was modeled.

Results: Coarse grid modeling showed annual average NO2 concentration levels within applicable standards. However, when fine grid modeling was conducted, the predicted annual average NO2 concentration levels were found to exceed World Bank Guidelines and Bangladesh Standards. A source contribution analysis showed that a quick rental power plant (natural gas generators) without proper stacks contributed a significant portion of the maximum 1-hr and annual average NO2 concentration (76% and 86%, respectively).

Conclusion: The findings of fine grid modeling can be used at the policy level of the government to enforce environmental regulations on the minimum height requirements of stacks and city planning, avoiding downwind directions and the close proximity of powerplants to safeguard human health.

Keywords: Air quality, dispersion modeling, fine-grid, nitrogen oxides, human health, Bangladesh.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Akhtaruzzaman M, Uddin J. 2020.
[2]
Islam S, Khan ZR. A review of energy sector of Bangladesh. Energy Procedia 2017; 110: 611-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.193]
[3]
Achievement At A Glance http://www.powercell.gov.bd/site/view/powerdiv_achievement_at_glance/-
[4]
Masud MH, Nuruzzaman M, Ahamed R, Ananno AA, Tomal ANMA. 2020.
[5]
Uddin MN, Rahman MA, Mofijur M, Taweekun J, Techato K, Rasul MG. 2019.
[6]
Revisiting PSMP 2016. 2018 ed.. Dhaka: Ministry of Power, Energy, and Mineral Resources 2018.
[7]
Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. 2009.
[8]
Harrison RM, Deacon AR, Jones MR. 1997.
[9]
Weintgartner E, Keller C, Stahel WA, Burtcher H, Baltensperger U. Aerosols emissions in road tunnel. Atmos Environ 1997; 3: 451-62.
[10]
Nitta H. Air Pollution and Respiratory Health among School Children in Japan. Proc Int Symp Ambient Fine Particles and Health. 101-2.
[11]
Karim MM, Ohno T. Air quality planning and empirical model to evaluate SPM concentrations. J Environ Eng 2000; 126(12): 1116-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:12(1116)]
[12]
https://www.epa.gov/no2-pollution2020.
[13]
Samet JM, Utell MJ. The risk of nitrogen dioxide: What have we learned from epidemiological and clinical studies? Toxicol Ind Health 1990; 6(2): 247-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074823379000600204] [PMID: 2192479]
[14]
Stroh E, Harrie L, Gustafsson S. A study of spatial resolution in pollution exposure modelling. Int J Health Geogr 2007; 6: 19.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-6-19] [PMID: 17547740]
[15]
Weijers EP, Khlystov AY, Kos GPA, Erisman JW. Variability of particulate matter concentrations along roads and motorways determined by a moving measurement unit. Atmos Environ 2004; 38(19): 2993-3002.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.045]
[16]
Isakov V, Irwin J, Ching J. Using CMAQ for exposure modeling and characterizing the subgrid variability for exposure estimates. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 2007; 46(9): 1354-71.
[17]
Air Dispersion Modelling Guideline for Ontario https://files.ontario.ca/admgo-id50_aoda_v2b.pdf2019.
[18]
Clarification on the Use of AERMOD Dispersion Modeling for Demonstrating Compliance with the NO2 National Ambient Air Quality Standard https://www3.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/clarification/NO2_Clarification_Memo-20140930.pdf
[19]
Environmental Conservation Rules. Bangladesh: Government of Bangladesh 1997.
[20]
Hanrahan PL. The plume volume molar ratio method for determining NO2/NOx ratios in modeling-part I: Methodology. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2011; 49(11): 1324-31.
[21]
Chu SH, Meyer EL. Use of Ambient Ratios to Estimate Impact of NOx Sources on Annual NO2 Concentrations. Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting & Exhibition.
[22]
Ozone Precursors http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1080890.pdf2020.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
9
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy