Abstract
Background: In this paper, an assessment of active power filter (APF) performance is presented under direct and indirect current control schemes through on-line compensation theory.
Methods: Conventional Direct Current Control (DCC) measures both load current and filter current beside source and DC-link voltages, while Indirect Current Control (ICC) measures only source current beside voltage measurements. Both DCC and ICC control algorithms are implemented using 80C196KC low-cost microcontroller.
Results: The performance parameters of APF are compared under two methods, and it is assigned that ICC gives a better performance with lower cost due to reduced number of sensors. The DC-link output voltage is controlled through simple PI-controller, and the PWM switching signals required by APF power circuit is obtained by hysteresis current controller.
Conclusion: The comparative simulation and experimental results exhibit that performance of APF due to ICC scheme is superior than DCC one.
Keywords: Active power filter, direct current control, indirect current control, harmonic distortion, reactive power, sinusoidal reference waveform.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TDCLA.2006.311607]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2307196]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/28.556633]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EURCON.2007.4400271]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DRPT.2004.1338067]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRERA.2018.8566973]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2008.2004958]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEPS.2016.7521872]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/63.844510]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2005.855627]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2009.2039983]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INDCON.2013.6725854]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15325000390203674]