Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2772-4328
ISSN (Online): 2772-4336

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Clinical Trial

Remifentanil with or without Propofol as Anesthesia Agents for Trans- Vaginal Ultrasonography Oocyte Retrieval (TUGOR) on Pregnancy and Anesthesia Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author(s): Simin Atashkhoei, Khadijeh Pouya*, Parvin Hakimi, Raana Zakeri, Nasrin Soltanzadeh and Pouya Hatami-Marandi

Volume 16, Issue 2, 2021

Published on: 23 June, 2020

Page: [182 - 190] Pages: 9

DOI: 10.2174/1574884715666200623161856

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Transvaginal Ultrasound-Guided Oocyte Retrieval (TUGOR) is a painful procedure, which often requires the application of anesthesia agents. There is a controversy in the literature about the effects of administrated anesthetics for TUGOR on patients & pregnancy outcomes.

Objective: The current study aimed to compare the effects of remifentanil with or without propofol, administrated for TUGOR, on pregnancy and anesthesia outcomes.

Method: In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 180 candidates of TUGOR, aged 18-40 years old, were included in the study. All study women received midazolam 0.03 mg/kg and remifentanil 1 ug/kg as anesthesia induction; Later on, they were randomly assigned in two equalsize groups in terms of anesthesia maintenance, as the intervention group received remifentanil infusion 0.25 μg/kg/min and the control group received remifentanil infusion 1ug/kg/min with propofol 50-150 ug/kg/min. Hemodynamic symptoms, operation outcomes, including the side effects, and pregnancy outcomes, were compared between the study groups. The study is registered with the Iranian Clinical Trials Registry, number IRCT201611177013N15.

Results: Although the hemodynamic symptoms showed significantly better ranges in the remifentanil group, however, the study groups were not significantly different in durations of operation, anesthesia, and recovery. However, the anesthesia side effects during and after the operation were not significantly different between the groups; they were more common in control one. The reproductive outcomes (numbers of collected oocytes, fertilized oocytes and transferred embryos, pregnancy rates) showed better but non-significant ranges in the remifentanil group.

Conclusion: Using remifentanil alone in comparison to remifentanil & propofol in the TUGOR procedure can be achieved better pregnancy outcomes without imposing the side effects of propofol; therefore, it is not recommended to use propofol as an anesthesia agent for a TUGOR procedure.

Keywords: Ultrasonography oocyte retrieval, anesthesia, pregnancy outcome, remifentanil, propofol, gonadotropin.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Wikland M, Enk L, Hammarberg K, Nilsson L. Use of a vaginal transducer for oocyte retrieval in an IVF/ET program. J Clin Ultrasound 1987; 15(4): 245-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870150405] [PMID: 3134424]
[2]
Vlahos NF, Giannakikou I, Vlachos A, Vitoratos N. Analgesia and anesthesia for assisted reproductive technologies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105(3): 201-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.01.017] [PMID: 19249049]
[3]
Chetkowski RJ, Nass TE. Isofluorane inhibits early mouse embryo development in vitro. Fertil Steril 1988; 49(1): 171-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59673-3] [PMID: 3335266]
[4]
Vincent RD Jr, Syrop CH, Van Voorhis BJ, et al. An evaluation of the effect of anesthetic technique on reproductive success after laparoscopic pronuclear stage transfer. Propofol/nitrous oxide versus isoflurane/nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology 1995; 82(2): 352-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199502000-00005] [PMID: 7856893]
[5]
Atashkhoii S, Abdollahi S. Conscious sedation with and without paracervical block for transvaginal ultrasonically guided oocyte collection: A comparison of the pain and sedation levels, and postoperative side effects 2006.
[6]
Gejervall A-L, Lundin K, Stener-Victorin E, Bergh C. Effect of alfentanil dosage during oocyte retrieval on fertilization and embryo quality. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 150(1): 66-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.01.007] [PMID: 20226584]
[7]
Wiener-Kronish JP. GMA Conscious sedation. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus 1st ed. 2001.
[8]
Soussis I, Boyd O, Paraschos T, et al. Follicular fluid levels of midazolam, fentanyl, and alfentanil during transvaginal oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril 1995; 64(5): 1003-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57919-9] [PMID: 7589618]
[9]
Endler GC, Stout M, Magyar DM, Hayes MF, Moghissi KS, Sacco AG. Follicular fluid concentrations of thiopental and thiamylal during laparoscopy for oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril 1987; 48(5): 828-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59539-9] [PMID: 3666185]
[10]
Bovenschen JL, Lawrence KA. Remifentanil and fenantyl concentrations in follicular fluid during transvaginal oocyte retrieval Master’s Thesis, University of Michigan: Michigan 1998.
[11]
Garg R, Dali J. Assisted reproductive technology and anesthetic considerations: Review of literature. Internet J Anesthesiol 2007; 18: 1-8.
[12]
Wilhelm W, Hammadeh ME, White PF, Georg T, Fleser R, Biedler A. General anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care with remifentanil for assisted reproductive technologies: Effect on pregnancy rate. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14(1): 1-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00331-2] [PMID: 11880013]
[13]
Wilhelm W, Biedler A, Hammadeh ME, Fleser R, Grüness V. Remifentanil for oocyte retrieval: A new single-agent monitored anaesthesia care technique. Anaesthesist 1999; 48(10): 698-704.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001010050773] [PMID: 10551918]
[14]
Yamakura T, Sakimura K, Shimoji K, Mishina M. Effects of propofol on various AMPA-, kainate- and NMDA-selective glutamate receptor channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Neurosci Lett 1995; 188(3): 187-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(95)11431-U] [PMID: 7609905]
[15]
Huang HW, Huang FJ, Kung FT, et al. Effects of induction anesthetic agents on outcome of assisted reproductive technology: A comparison of propofol and thiopental sodium. Chang Gung Med J 2000; 23(9): 513-9.
[PMID: 11092139]
[16]
Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. 7th ed. Phyladelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2005.
[17]
Checketts MR, Alladi R, Ferguson K, et al. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia 2016; 71(1): 85-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.13316] [PMID: 26582586]
[18]
Saleh SE, Elshmaa NS, Ismail MT. A comparison of two different regimens of total intravenous anesthesia for transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2012; 17(4): 256-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mefs.2012.07.003]
[19]
Coskun D, Gunaydin B, Tas A, Inan G, Celebi H, Kaya K. A comparison of three different target-controlled remifentanil infusion rates during target-controlled propofol infusion for oocyte retrieval. Clinics (São Paulo) 2011; 66(5): 811-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000500017] [PMID: 21789385]
[20]
Casati A, Valentini G, Zangrillo A, et al. Anaesthesia for ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval: Midazolam/remifentanil versus propofol/fentanyl regimens. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16(11): 773-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003643-199911000-00005] [PMID: 10713871]
[21]
Shafer A, Doze VA, Shafer SL, White PF. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol infusions during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1988; 69(3): 348-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198809000-00011] [PMID: 3261954]
[22]
Matsota P, Sidiropoulou T, Batistaki C, et al. Analgesia with remifentanil versus anesthesia with propofol-alfentanil for transvaginal oocyte retrieval: A randomized trial on their impact on in vitro fertilization outcome. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2012; 21(5): 685-92.
[PMID: 23265031]
[23]
Hammadeh ME, Wilhelm W, Huppert A, Rosenbaum P, Schmidt W. Effects of general anaesthesia vs. sedation on fertilization, cleavage and pregnancy rates in an IVF program. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1999; 263(1-2): 56-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004040050263] [PMID: 10728631]
[24]
Jarahzadeh MH, Davar R, Hajiesmaeili MR, Entezari A, Musavi F. Remifentanil versus fentanyl for assisted reproductive technologies: Effect on hemodynamic recovery from anesthesia and Outcome of ART Cycles. Int J Fertil Steril 2011; 5(2): 86-9.
[PMID: 24963364]
[25]
Piroli A, Marci R, Marinangeli F, et al. Comparison of different anaesthetic methodologies for sedation during in vitro fertilization procedures: Effects on patient physiology and oocyte competence. Gynecol Endocrinol 2012; 28(10): 796-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2012.664193] [PMID: 22420562]
[26]
Christiaens F, Janssenswillen C, Verborgh C, et al. Propofol concentrations in follicular fluid during general anaesthesia for transvaginal oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod 1999; 14(2): 345-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.2.345] [PMID: 10099976]
[27]
Coetsier T, Dhont M, De Sutter P, Merchiers E, Versichelen L, Rosseel MT. Propofol anaesthesia for ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval: Accumulation of the anaesthetic agent in follicular fluid. Hum Reprod 1992; 7(10): 1422-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137586] [PMID: 1291569]
[28]
Ben-Shlomo I, Moskovich R, Golan J, Eyali V, Tabak A, Shalev E. The effect of propofol anaesthesia on oocyte fertilization and early embryo quality. Hum Reprod 2000; 15(10): 2197-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.10.2197] [PMID: 11006198]
[29]
Christiaens F, Janssenswillen C, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P, Verborgh C, Camu F. Comparison of assisted reproductive technology performance after oocyte retrieval under general anaesthesia (propofol) versus paracervical local anaesthetic block: A case-controlled study. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(9): 2456-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.9.2456] [PMID: 9806267]
[30]
Milanini MN, D’onofrio P, Melani Novelli AM, et al. Local anesthesia versus intravenous infusion of remifentanil for assisted reproductive technologies. A retrospective study. Minerva Ginecol 2008; 60(3): 203-7.
[PMID: 18547982]
[31]
Matsota P, Kaminioti E, Kostopanagiotou G. Anesthesia related toxic effects on in vitro fertilization outcome: Burden of proof 2015; 2015.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/475362]
[32]
Guasch E, Gómez R, Brogly N, Gilsanz F. Anesthesia and analgesia for transvaginal oocyte retrieval. Should we recommend or avoid any anesthetic drug or technique? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2019; 32(3): 285-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000715] [PMID: 31045635]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
11
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy