Abstract
Background: 5-fluorouracil and resveratrol are the two most effective anticancer drugs. Combination therapy with these two drugs has shown promising results in cancer. The formulation containing 5-fluorouracil and resveratrol has been prepared, but no analytical method is available in the literature for their simultaneous estimation. However, several analytical methods are there for estimation of either 5-fluorouracil or resveratrol alone. Therefore, the present article is designed for the simultaneous estimation of 5-fluorouracil and resveratrol by HPLC and its application in the quantification of the drugs present in the formulated nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC).
Methods: The method was developed using a C18 column (Purospher® STAR RP-18 endcapped (5 μm) Hibar® RT 250-4.6) with acetonitrile and water as the mobile phase (25:75 v/v) and estimated at 272 nm. The currently developed method was further validated by the ICH guideline Q2 (R1). Combinatorial NLC of 5-fluorouracil and resveratrol was also prepared and characterized.
Results: The LOD and LOQ were 8.22 and 24.91 μg mL-1 and 6.58 and 19.93 μg mL-1, respectively. The precision was under the acceptable limits of <2% RSD. The content of 5-fluorouracil and resveratrol in NLC were found to be 99.452% and 96.421%, respectively.
Conclusion: The findings showed that the developed and validated method was simple, fast, costeffective, and reproducible for the simultaneous estimation of both the drugs in the same formulation.
Keywords: Compatibility, forced degradation, ICH guideline Q2 (R1), isosbestic point, simultaneous determination, stability indicating.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000479529] [PMID: 29262420]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.035] [PMID: 27264180]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2010.12.030] [PMID: 21215251]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf0112973] [PMID: 12010007]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12196] [PMID: 23855462]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox3020212] [PMID: 26784868]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2011.581655] [PMID: 21668403]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00008]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2006.12.025] [PMID: 17306316]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2015.08.105] [PMID: 26310874]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3675] [PMID: 25936796]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i20.3048] [PMID: 15378791]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/424239]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1535370215573396] [PMID: 25736303]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-014-0103-1] [PMID: 24668136]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/icpj.v3i7.19079]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502013000100013]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.59544] [PMID: 20376215]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND140917004C]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1299-x]
[PMID: 24754017]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.078] [PMID: 26617040]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.01.004] [PMID: 21324753]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2011.10.005] [PMID: 22075374]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dta.201] [PMID: 21038374]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10826076.2011.597063]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201701340] [PMID: 29288527]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.08.066 PMID: 25306352]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcas.2013.04.006]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1006.2019.32.5.7]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.07.017] [PMID: 27449630]