Abstract
Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate the anticancer and testosteroneinhibitory effects of 2‘-{[(E) androst-5-en-17-ylidene]methyl}-4‘,5‘-dihydro-1‘,3‘-oxazole-3β-oleate (Alsevirone-NF).
Materials and Methods: PC-3, DU-145, LnCap and 22rv1 prostate cancer cell lines were used for MTT assay. 22rv1 subcutaneous cancer xenografts in Balb/c nude mice were used for in vivo efficacy experiments. Testosterone level was determined after repeated administration of Abiraterone 20, 100 or 200 mg/kg vs Alsevirone-NF 5, 25 or 50 mg/kg daily for 14 days.
Results: Alsevirone-NF induced more significant cytotoxicity against PC3, 22rv1 and DU-145 cell lines compared to Abiraterone or Alsevirone-treated control: IC50 7.1 vs 20.6 vs 29.1 μg/ml, 7.7 vs 20.0 vs 12.7 μg/ml, 3.8 vs 43.4 vs 8.5 μg/ml, respectively. IC50 in LnCap cells was almost equal for all three studied agents, 29.2 vs 26.2 vs 30.2 μg/ml for Abiraterone, Alsevirone and Alsevirone-NF. In gonadectomized mice, significant reduction of testosterone level was observed in mice receiving Alsevirone-NF in a maximum single dose of 50 mg/kg (cumulative dose 700 mg/kg): 0.2 nmol/l vs 0.57 nmol/l in control group and 0.83 nmol/l in Abiraterone group, single dose 100 mg/kg. Statistically significant anticancer effect in vivo was obtained on day 11 after the start of treatment: Abiraterone T/C = 27% (p<0.05), Alsevirone-NF single dose 1200 mg/kg Т/С = 45% (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Alsevirone-NF exhibited higher cytotoxic activity, comparable anticancer effect in 22rv1-bearing Balb/c nude mice and provided a more significant reduction of testosterone level in gonadectomized mice in direct comparison against Abiraterone.
Keywords: Prostate cancer, alsevirone, castrate-resistant prostate cancer, 22rv1 xenografts, CYP17A1 inhibitor, cytotoxicity.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2702] [PMID: 26903579]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2011.06.002] [PMID: 21729712]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9749] [PMID: 18645193]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9259] [PMID: 20159814]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0521] [PMID: 25351916]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4665]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2016.06.002] [PMID: 27505042]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2017.11.009] [PMID: 29183745]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2019.108534] [PMID: 31678134]
[PMID: 17717971]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd1632] [PMID: 15688077]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/mp0700211] [PMID: 17715989]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3406-6] [PMID: 28776077]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.031] [PMID: 28919099]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-017-0536-2] [PMID: 28425029]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pros.23935] [PMID: 31799745]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2019.07.013]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323102111] [PMID: 24395797]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11941] [PMID: 27626485]