Abstract
Objective: Early exposure to general anesthesia in children might be a potentially highrisk factor for learning and behavioral disorders. The mechanism of neurotoxicity induced by general anesthesia was not defined. miR-496 could regulate cerebral injury, while the roles of miR- 496 in neurotoxicity were not elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of miR- 496 in neurotoxicity induced by propofol.
Methods: Primary Prefrontal Cortical (PFC) neurons were isolated from neonatal rats and treated with propofol to induce neurotoxicity. Cell viability was detected by (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol- 2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, and cell apoptosis was assessed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. The target relationship of miR-496 and Rho Associated Coiled-Coil Containing Protein Kinase 2 (ROCK2) was explored using luciferase assays.
Results: Propofol decreased cell viability, promoted cell apoptosis, and decreased the expression of miR-496 in PFC neurons in a dose-dependent manner. Overexpression of miR-496 attenuated neurotoxicity induced by propofol in PFC neurons. ROCK2 was a target of miR-496, and miR-496 oppositely modulated the expression of ROCK2. Besides, propofol increased the expression of ROCK2 through inhibiting miR-496 in PFC neurons. Overexpression of miR-496 attenuated propofol- induced neurotoxicity by targeting ROCK2 in PFC neurons.
Conclusion: miR-496 was decreased in PFC neurons treated with propofol, and overexpression of miR-496 attenuated propofol-induced neurotoxicity by targeting ROCK2. miR-496 and ROCK2 may be promising targets for protecting propofol-induced neurotoxicity.
Keywords: miR-496, ROCK2, propofol, neurotoxicity, viability, apoptosis.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000278892.62305.9c] [PMID: 17721245]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.11.025] [PMID: 22297171]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-03-00876.2003] [PMID: 12574416]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00368] [PMID: 29218001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.09.001] [PMID: 30217735]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13273-017-0044-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2016.10.001] [PMID: 27751818]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.11.008] [PMID: 22305025]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182323261] [PMID: 22021793]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12640-016-9629-1] [PMID: 27189477]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.04.011] [PMID: 28465226]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.03.052] [PMID: 29578002]
[PMID: 26146587]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/CBM-170167] [PMID: 28869449]
[PMID: 31436348]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.12.039] [PMID: 30597231]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031423] [PMID: 22348083]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1748-4] [PMID: 30196430]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000504886] [PMID: 31537002]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.07.198]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616024114] [PMID: 28396402]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-6606-3-20] [PMID: 20569495]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061787] [PMID: 23593498]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbf.3077] [PMID: 25431245]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000345] [PMID: 24950164]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den439] [PMID: 19091803]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1293/tox.2016-0019] [PMID: 27821907]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2014.191] [PMID: 24832597]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.009] [PMID: 23954743]