Abstract
Background: Artemisia annua is well known for its anti-malarial bio-active compound artemisinin. Development of elite planting material of A. annua and its agro-technology can fulfill the requirement of Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) dosages worldwide.
Objectives: To develop an efficient in-vitro propagation protocol for A. annua and assess the field performance of in-vitro propagated plants for their growth and artemisinin yield.
Methods: The in-vitro propagation protocol of A. annua was developed using the nodal segment in four steps viz: initiation, multiplication, rooting and hardening. In-vitro propagated plants were transplanted with open-pollinated seed raised plants in an experimental field trial having soil supplementation of Farm Yard Manure (FYM), vermicompost and NPK.
Result: Maximum 92% shoots were initiated in Murashige and Skoog medium (MS) with 0.44 μM 6-benzyl aminopurine (BA) and highest 281.33 ± 09.75 micro-shoots/inoculum obtained in MS with 15.54 μM BA. The maximum number of roots was found in MS with 100 mg/L activated charcoal while 78.20% of plants survived in the sand: soil: vermicompost (1:1:1) mixture. The highest dry leaf yield (6.37 t/ha) was observed in in-vitro propagated plants grown with vermicompost, while highest artemisinin content (1.11 ± 0.10) and artemisinin yield (65.05 kg/ha) was found in the in-vitro propagated plants grown with FYM after 120 days of transplantation.
Conclusion: This study reports an efficient, cost-effective and rapid in-vitro propagation protocol for A. annua as well as enhanced artemisinin yield through the cultivation of in-vitro propagated plants using organic soil supplement inputs. This would lead to an increase in the production of artemisinin yield and fulfill the demand of Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT).
Keywords: Micropropagation, HPTLC, farm yard manure (FYM), vermicompost, agriculture, medicinal plant.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/297096]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-960230]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01372-8] [PMID: 11764006]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.34.10.1961] [PMID: 2291661]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.35.6.1225] [PMID: 1929266]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2005.07.005] [PMID: 16122816]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2005.10.003] [PMID: 16325931]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(02)02500-5]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12051] [PMID: 23575629]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/530390a] [PMID: 26911755]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12033-007-0031-3] [PMID: 17914178]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.10711] [PMID: 12889030]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/znc-2008-1-218] [PMID: 18386496]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.061] [PMID: 17804216]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/ptcb.v23i2.17518]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00358] [PMID: 29636758]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.07.003]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902012000300017]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/ptcb.v22i1.11257]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.121.2.339]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929867013371635] [PMID: 11772351]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2013.499.506]