Abstract
Background: Previous research from our laboratory implicated opioid and benzodiazepine- GABA mechanisms in other effects of N2O (antinociception and anxiolysis), so a decision was made to study these as potential mechanisms of N2O-induced dysfunction of spatial working memory.
Objective: to explore potential mechanisms of N2O in reducing spatial working memory in mice. Methods: we monitored spontaneous alternation behavior (SAB) in male NIH Swiss mice exposed to N2O during a T-maze spontaneous alternation task (T-SAT). Results: mice that were exposed to 70% N2O (in O2) exhibited severely and significantly reduced spontaneous alternation behavior in the T-SAT. Mice in this environment alternated their route only 33% of the time, in comparison to the control (room air) rate of alternation at approximately 70%. Mice pretreated with the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil exhibited a dose-dependent restoration of spatial working memory under 70% N2O in the T-SAT. Alternatively, pretreatment with neither the GABAA antagonist gabazine nor the opioid antagonist naloxone had any appreciable effect on the N2O-reduced SAB. Conclusion: this study verified that 70% N2O can reduce spatial working memory in mice, which appears to involve benzodiazepine mechanisms in the brain.Keywords: Amnesia, flumazenil, gabazine, mouse, naloxone, nitrous oxide, spatial memory.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170370016002] [PMID: 8953995]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004850-199100630-00005] [PMID: 1806623]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000266491.53318.20] [PMID: 17578961]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.10.017] [PMID: 26496821]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00212843] [PMID: 2836875]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(79)90269-3] [PMID: 428506]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.2.2.97]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006(2007)54[9:AIUTAO]2.0.CO;2] [PMID: 17352529]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.982058] [PMID: 982058]
[PMID: 925957]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(88)91156-0] [PMID: 2833991]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.091] [PMID: 19747467]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.010] [PMID: 20937263]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02245153] [PMID: 1319602]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02245699] [PMID: 7855183]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(93)90335-Q] [PMID: 8255907]
[PMID: 8229738]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02244768] [PMID: 7862891]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00487-7] [PMID: 11526978]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.06.006] [PMID: 15465137]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00214-3] [PMID: 9754881]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2003.08.004] [PMID: 15084419]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.2] [PMID: 17406205]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03021298] [PMID: 13742373]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02245420] [PMID: 1570385]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800330] [PMID: 10630045]
[PMID: 7385446]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.03.083] [PMID: 15193748]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000052712.67573.12] [PMID: 12651650]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200402000-00020] [PMID: 14739805]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0045446] [PMID: 13602020]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0083776] [PMID: 13815794]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2008.06.005] [PMID: 18625329]
[PMID: 8857656]
[PMID: 439005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(83)90220-0] [PMID: 6873171]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200305000-00026] [PMID: 12717145]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000050282.14291.38] [PMID: 12598256]