Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Protein & Peptide Letters

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 0929-8665
ISSN (Online): 1875-5305

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Case Report

Physiological State Dictates the Proteasomal-Mediated Purging of Misfolded Protein Fragments

Author(s): Mohamed A. Eldeeb*, Mohamed A. Ragheb, Mansoore Esmaili and Faraz Hussein

Volume 27, Issue 3, 2020

Page: [251 - 255] Pages: 5

DOI: 10.2174/0929866526666191026111951

Price: $65

Abstract

A pivotal feature that underlies the development of neurodegeneration is the accumulation of protein aggregates. In response, eukaryotic cells have evolved sophisticated quality control mechanisms to identify, repair and/or eliminate the misfolded abnormal proteins. Chaperones identify any otherwise abnormal conformations in proteins and often help them to regain their correct conformation. However, if repair is not an option, the abnormal protein is selectively degraded to prevent its oligomerization into toxic multimeric complexes. Autophagiclysosomal system and the ubiquitin-proteasome system mediate the targeted degradation of the aberrant protein fragments. Despite the increasing understanding of the molecular counteracting responses toward the accumulation of dysfunctional misfolded proteins, the molecular links between the upstream physiological inputs and the clearance of abnormal misfolded proteins is relatively poorly understood. Recent work has demonstrated that certain physiological states such as vigorous exercise and fasting may enhance the ability of mammalian cells to clear misfolded, toxic and aberrant protein fragments. These findings unveil a novel mechanism that activates the cells' protein-disposal machinery, facilitating the adaptation process of cellular proteome to fluctuations in cellular demands and alterations of environmental cues. Herein, we briefly discuss the molecular interconnection between certain physiological cues and proteasomal degradation pathway in the context of these interesting findings and highlight some of the future prospects.

Keywords: Proteasome, protein degradation, aging, neurodegeneration, ubiquitin, protein quality control, N-degron, N-end rule, protein turnover.

« Previous
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Varshavsky, A. Regulated protein degradation. Trends Biochem. Sci., 2005, 30(6), 283-286.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2005.04.005] [PMID: 15950869]
[2]
Varshavsky, A. The N-end rule pathway and regulation by proteolysis. Protein Sci., 2011, 20(8), 1298-1345.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.666] [PMID: 21633985]
[3]
Eldeeb, M.; Fahlman, R. The-N-end rule: The beginning determines the end. Protein Pept. Lett., 2016, 23(4), 343-348.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929866523666160108115809] [PMID: 26743630]
[4]
Eldeeb, M.A.; Ragheb, M.A. Post-translational N-terminal arginylation of protein fragments: A pivotal portal to proteolysis. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci., 2018, 19(12), 1214-1223.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389203719666180809113122] [PMID: 30091410]
[5]
Eldeeb, M.; Esmaili, M.; Fahlman, R. Degradation of proteins with N-terminal glycine. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 2019, 26(9), 761-763.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41594-019-0291-1]
[6]
Varshavsky, A. Discovery of cellular regulation by protein degradation. J. Biol. Chem., 2008, 283(50), 34469-34489.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.X800009200] [PMID: 18708349]
[7]
Eldeeb, M.A.; Fahlman, R.P.; Esmaili, M.; Ragheb, M.A. Regulating apoptosis by degradation: The N-end rule-mediated regulation of apoptotic proteolytic fragments in mammalian cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2018, 19(11), 3414-3432.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113414] [PMID: 30384441]
[8]
Eldeeb, M.A.; Leitao, L.C.A.; Fahlman, R.P. Emerging branches of the N-end rule pathways are revealing the sequence complexities of N-termini dependent protein degradation. Biochem. Cell Biol., 2018, 96(3), 289-294.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/bcb-2017-0274] [PMID: 29253354]
[9]
Kramer, D.A.; Eldeeb, M.A.; Wuest, M.; Mercer, J.; Fahlman, R.P. Proteomic characterization of EL4 lymphoma-derived tumors upon chemotherapy treatment reveals potential roles for lysosomes and caspase-6 during tumor cell death in vivo. Proteomics, 2017, 17(12)1700060
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700060] [PMID: 28508578]
[10]
Eldeeb, M.A. Aging: When the ubiquitin–proteasome machinery collapses. AIMS Mol. Sci., 2017, 4(2), 219-223.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/molsci.2017.2.219]
[11]
Eldeeb, M.A.; Ragheb, M.A.; Fon, E.A. Cell death: N-degrons fine-tune pyroptotic cell demise. Curr. Biol., 2019, 29(12), R588-R591.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.004] [PMID: 31211982]
[12]
Varshavsky, A. N-degron and C-degron pathways of protein degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2019, 116(2), 358-366.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816596116] [PMID: 30622213]
[13]
Eldeeb, M.A.; Fahlman, R.P. The anti-apoptotic form of tyrosine kinase Lyn that is generated by proteolysis is degraded by the N-end rule pathway. Oncotarget, 2014, 5(9), 2714-2722.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.1931] [PMID: 24798867]
[14]
Qiu, J.; Sheedlo, M.J.; Yu, K.; Tan, Y.; Nakayasu, E.S.; Das, C.; Liu, X.; Luo, Z-Q. Ubiquitination independent of E1 and E2 enzymes by bacterial effectors. Nature, 2016, 533(7601), 120-124.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature17657] [PMID: 27049943]
[15]
Eldeeb, M.A.; Siva-Piragasam, R.; Ragheb, M.A.; Esmaili, M.; Salla, M.; Fahlman, R.P. A molecular toolbox for studying protein degradation in mammalian cells. J. Neurochem., 2019. Epub ahead of print
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14838] [PMID: 31357232]
[16]
Eldeeb, M.A.; Fahlman, R.P.; Esmaili, M.; Fon, E.A. Formylation of eukaryotic cytoplasmic proteins: Linking stress to degradation. Trends Biochem. Sci., 2019, 44(3), 181-183.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2018.12.008] [PMID: 30661830]
[17]
Eldeeb, M.A.; MacDougall, E.J.; Ragheb, M.A.; Fon, E.A.; Beyond, E.R. Regulating TOM-complex-mediated import by Ubx2. Trends Cell Biol., 2019, 29(9), 687-689.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2019.07.003] [PMID: 31358413]
[18]
Collins, G.A.; Goldberg, A.L. The logic of the 26S proteasome. Cell, 2017, 169(5), 792-806.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.023] [PMID: 28525752]
[19]
VerPlank, J.J.S.; Goldberg, A.L. Regulating protein breakdown through proteasome phosphorylation. Biochem. J., 2017, 474(19), 3355-3371.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160809] [PMID: 28947610]
[20]
Eldeeb, M.A.; Fahlman, R.; Ragheb, M.A.; Esmaili, M. Does N-terminal Protein Acetylation lead to protein degradation? BioEssays, 2019. [Epub ahead of print]
[21]
Lokireddy, S.; Kukushkin, N.V.; Goldberg, A.L. cAMP-induced phosphorylation of 26S proteasomes on Rpn6/PSMD11 enhances their activity and the degradation of misfolded proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2015, 112(52), E7176-E7185.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522332112] [PMID: 26669444]
[22]
Myeku, N.; Clelland, C.L.; Emrani, S.; Kukushkin, N.V.; Yu, W.H.; Goldberg, A.L.; Duff, K.E. Tau-driven 26S proteasome impairment and cognitive dysfunction can be prevented early in disease by activating cAMP-PKA signaling. Nat. Med., 2016, 22(1), 46-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.4011] [PMID: 26692334]
[23]
Guo, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Banerjee, S.; Yang, J.; Huang, L.; Dixon, J.E. Site-specific proteasome phosphorylation controls cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Nat. Cell Biol., 2016, 18(2), 202-212.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb3289] [PMID: 26655835]
[24]
Banerjee, S.; Ji, C.; Mayfield, J.E.; Goel, A.; Xiao, J.; Dixon, J.E.; Guo, X. Ancient drug curcumin impedes 26S proteasome activity by direct inhibition of dual-specificity tyrosine-regulated kinase 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2018, 115(32), 8155-8160.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806797115] [PMID: 29987021]
[25]
Ranek, M.J.; Terpstra, E.J.; Li, J.; Kass, D.A.; Wang, X. Protein kinase g positively regulates proteasome-mediated degradation of misfolded proteins. Circulation, 2013, 128(4), 365-376.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001971] [PMID: 23770744]
[26]
Ranek, M.J.; Kost, C.K., Jr; Hu, C.; Martin, D.S.; Wang, X. Muscarinic 2 receptors modulate cardiac proteasome function in a protein kinase G-dependent manner. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol., 2014, 69, 43-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.01.017] [PMID: 24508699]
[27]
VerPlank, J.J.S.; Lokireddy, S.; Zhao, J.; Goldberg, A.L. 26S Proteasomes are rapidly activated by diverse hormones and physiological states that raise cAMP and cause Rpn6 phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2019, 116(10), 4228-4237.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809254116] [PMID: 30782827]
[28]
Guo, X.; Huang, X.; Chen, M.J. Reversible phosphorylation of the 26S proteasome. Protein Cell, 2017, 8(4), 255-272.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13238-017-0382-x] [PMID: 28258412]
[29]
Hoffman, N.J.; Parker, B.L.; Chaudhuri, R.; Fisher-Wellman, K.H.; Kleinert, M.; Humphrey, S.J.; Yang, P.; Holliday, M.; Trefely, S.; Fazakerley, D.J.; Stöckli, J.; Burchfield, J.G.; Jensen, T.E.; Jothi, R.; Kiens, B.; Wojtaszewski, J.F.; Richter, E.A.; James, D.E. Global phosphoproteomic analysis of human skeletal muscle reveals a network of exercise-regulated kinases and AMPK substrates. Cell Metab., 2015, 22(5), 922-935.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.09.001] [PMID: 26437602]
[30]
Zhang, F.; Hu, Y.; Huang, P.; Toleman, C.A.; Paterson, A.J.; Kudlow, J.E. Proteasome function is regulated by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase through phosphorylation of Rpt6. J. Biol. Chem., 2007, 282(31), 22460-22471.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M702439200] [PMID: 17565987]
[31]
Djakovic, S.N.; Schwarz, L.A.; Barylko, B.; DeMartino, G.N.; Patrick, G.N. Regulation of the proteasome by neuronal activity and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. J. Biol. Chem., 2009, 284(39), 26655-26665.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.021956] [PMID: 19638347]
[32]
Peth, A.; Nathan, J.A.; Goldberg, A.L. The ATP costs and time required to degrade ubiquitinated proteins by the 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem., 2013, 288(40), 29215-29222.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.482570] [PMID: 23965995]
[33]
Bard, J.A.M.; Goodall, E.A.; Greene, E.R.; Jonsson, E.; Dong, K.C.; Martin, A. Structure and function of the 26S proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 2018, 87, 697-724.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-011931] [PMID: 29652515]
[34]
Rousseau, A.; Bertolotti, A. Regulation of proteasome assembly and activity in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2018, 19(11), 697-712.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41580-018-0040-z] [PMID: 30065390]
[35]
VerPlank, J.J.S.; Lokireddy, S.; Feltri, M.L.; Goldberg, A.L.; Wrabetz, L. Impairment of protein degradation and proteasome function in hereditary neuropathies. Glia, 2018, 66(2), 379-395.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/glia.23251] [PMID: 29076578]
[36]
Kristiansen, M.; Deriziotis, P.; Dimcheff, D.E.; Jackson, G.S.; Ovaa, H.; Naumann, H.; Clarke, A.R.; van Leeuwen, F.W.; Menéndez-Benito, V.; Dantuma, N.P.; Portis, J.L.; Collinge, J.; Tabrizi, S.J. Disease-associated prion protein oligomers inhibit the 26S proteasome. Mol. Cell, 2007, 26(2), 175-188.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.04.001] [PMID: 17466621]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
19
3
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy